United States v. Shaughnessy, No. 289
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | 177 F.2d 708 |
| Decision Date | 30 September 1949 |
| Docket Number | No. 289,Docket 21452. |
| Parties | UNITED STATES ex rel. PIRINSKY v. SHAUGHNESSY. |
177 F.2d 708 (1949)
UNITED STATES ex rel. PIRINSKY
v.
SHAUGHNESSY.
No. 289, Docket 21452.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued September 16, 1949.
Decided September 30, 1949.
Carol King, of New York City (Isidore Englander and Harry M. Justiz, both of New York City, on the brief), for relator-appellant.
Harold J. Raby, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City (John F. X. McGohey, U. S. Atty., of New York City, and Louis Steinberg, Dist. Counsel, and Lester Friedman, Atty., New York Dist., Immigration and Naturalization Service, on the brief), for respondent-appellee.
Before SWAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges, and HINCKS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The relator, an alien who entered this country in 1923, was taken into custody in deportation proceedings on September 23, 1948, and then released on $1,000 bail. On July 7, 1949, he was rearrested and all bail
It was brought out at the argument before us that the bail ultimately set was uniquely high in this type of proceeding. While that fact in itself should presumably not be controlling, since the issue in each case must be individual as to the amount reasonably designed to insure the alien's necessary attendance upon the proceedings, yet the circumstances of this relator are not such as to suggest unusual doubt as to his continued availability here. He has worked in this country since 1923 and has been an official in Macedonian and Bulgarian organizations here. He is married to an American citizen and has an infant son. Respondent, claiming also that the first district judge was in error in interfering with the Attorney...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Harisiades v. Shaughnessy
...States by force and violence." 7 See Connor v. Miller, 2 Cir., 178 F.2d 755. 8 See United States ex rel. Pirinsky v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 177 F.2d 708, September 30, 9 I believe that that observation does not apply to membership in the Communist Party of the United States, which during Hari......
-
United States v. Field, No. 300-302
...v. District Director of Immigration and Naturalization, 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 747, 751; United States ex rel. Pirinsky v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 177 F.2d 708; Zydok v. Butterfield, 6 Cir., 187 F. 2d 802, 804; Williamson v. United States, 2 Cir., 184 F.2d 280; People of the State of Ill. ex rel. Sa......
-
Carlson v. Landon Butterfield v. Zydok, Nos. 35
...a reasonable foundation.' See U.S. ex rel. Doyle v. District Director, 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 753; U.S. ex rel. Pirinsky v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 177 F.2d 708; U.S. ex rel. De Geronimi v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 187 F.2d 896. (This is the only case from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals since the I......
-
United States v. McGrath, No. 192
...views we accept, the refusal to suspend action here, on the record facts, was improper. In U. S. ex rel. Pirinsky v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 177 F.2d 708, 709, an alien, a resident of this country, was arrested and taken in custody in deportation proceedings. On his application for release on ......
-
Harisiades v. Shaughnessy
...States by force and violence." 7 See Connor v. Miller, 2 Cir., 178 F.2d 755. 8 See United States ex rel. Pirinsky v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 177 F.2d 708, September 30, 9 I believe that that observation does not apply to membership in the Communist Party of the United States, which during Hari......
-
United States v. Field, No. 300-302
...v. District Director of Immigration and Naturalization, 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 747, 751; United States ex rel. Pirinsky v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 177 F.2d 708; Zydok v. Butterfield, 6 Cir., 187 F. 2d 802, 804; Williamson v. United States, 2 Cir., 184 F.2d 280; People of the State of Ill. ex rel. Sa......
-
Carlson v. Landon Butterfield v. Zydok, Nos. 35
...a reasonable foundation.' See U.S. ex rel. Doyle v. District Director, 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 753; U.S. ex rel. Pirinsky v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 177 F.2d 708; U.S. ex rel. De Geronimi v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 187 F.2d 896. (This is the only case from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals since the I......
-
United States v. McGrath, No. 192
...views we accept, the refusal to suspend action here, on the record facts, was improper. In U. S. ex rel. Pirinsky v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 177 F.2d 708, 709, an alien, a resident of this country, was arrested and taken in custody in deportation proceedings. On his application for release on ......