United States v. Shaughnessy
| Decision Date | 09 May 1956 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America ex rel. LEE MING HON, also known as Ming Hon Lee, Relator, v. Edward J. SHAUGHNESSY, as District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service of the United States, Department of Justice, for the District of New York, or such person, if any, who might have said relator in custody, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Spar, Schlem & Burroughs, New York City, for relator.
Paul W. Williams, U. S. Atty. for the Southern Dist. of New York, New York City, for respondent, Roy Babitt, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel.
Relator, a deserter from a vessel of Chinese Merchants Steam Navigation Co., Ltd., objects to being placed on board a vessel for ostensible deportation to Formosa on the ground that he has no assurance that he will be permitted to land there. All that the Government offers as proof that he will be admitted is a letter from said China Merchants Steam Navigation Co., Ltd., on a letter headed "Chinese Government Procurement & Services Mission Division For China Merchants Steam Navigation Co., Ltd., Ministry of Communications, Republic of China, 149 Broadway, New York 6, N. Y." The letter states that the company will have no difficulty in arranging traveling documents for the deportation of such deserters back to Formosa. The Government asks the court to rely on this statement. I cannot see the necessity for doing so. If the Government can obtain the proper travel documents through the Chinese Merchants Steam Navigation Co., Ltd., it will do no harm to defer relator's deportation until they have been obtained. If the Government cannot so obtain the documents, the relator ought not to be pushed out of this country onto a ship which may be his prison for the rest of his life.
The writ will be sustained unless the Government, within 30 days from the date hereof, obtains and exhibits to the court and to relator's counsel, official documents permitting the landing of relator in Formosa, or advises the court and relator's counsel that it has made the inquiry of the Nationalist Chinese Government contemplated by section 1253 of 8 United States Code.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jama v. I.N.S.
...country advises us it is willing to accept the alien. Rogers v. Lu, 262 F.2d 471, 471 (D.C.Cir.1958); United States ex rel. Lee Ming Hon v. Shaughnessy, 142 F.Supp. 468, 468 (S.D.N.Y.1956). Forty-four years ago, Judge Learned Hand interpreted the statutory provisions at issue here and concl......
-
Matter of De Lucla
...B.I.A., December 7, 1960. 10. Lu v. Rogers, 164 F. Supp. 320 (D.C. D.C. 1958), aff'd 262 F.2d 471 (C.A. D.C. 1958); U.S. ex rel. Tom Man v. Shaughnessy, 142 F. Supp. 444, D.C. S.D.N.Y. (1956); U.S. ex rel. Lee Ming Hon v. Shaughnessy, 142 F. Supp. 468 (D.C. S.D.N.Y. 11. He served three year......
-
Chang Ah Ding v. United States, 16272.
...from the jurisdiction of this court, during the pendency and until the final determination of said appeal." 2 United States ex rel. Tom Man v. Shaughnessy, D.C., 142 F.Supp. 444; United States ex rel. Fong Foo v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 234 F.2d 715; United States ex rel. Leong Choy Moon v. Sh......
-
Feng Yeat Chow v. Shaughnessy
...75 S.Ct. 524, 99 L.Ed. 752. 5 United States ex rel. Donlenz v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 206 F.2d 392, 394. 6 Cf. U. S. ex rel. Lee Ming Hon v. Shaughnessy, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 142 F.Supp. 468. 7 U. S. ex rel. Miletic v. District Director of Immigration, etc., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 108 F.Supp. 8 Webster's New......