United States v. Shepard's Estate
Decision Date | 26 June 1963 |
Docket Number | No. 382,Docket 27727.,382 |
Citation | 319 F.2d 699 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ESTATE of Kenneth L. SHEPARD, Milo J. Shepard, Executor, and Milo J. Shepard, Carl P. Shepard and Elsie M. Shepard, Legatees, Defendants-Appellants. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Milo J. Shepard, Syracuse, N. Y., for appellants.
David I. Granger, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, David O. Walter, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Justin J. Mahoney, U. S. Atty. for the Northern Dist. of New York, Arthur F. Barns, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.
Before MOORE, HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.
In this action by the United States to recover unpaid income taxes for the year 1947, the sole issues relate to whether the assessment of the taxes, and this action for their collection, were timely. We agree with the district court that they were, and affirm the judgment with one minor modification.
The decedent, Kenneth L. Shepard, filed his 1947 federal income tax return on April 15, 1948, showing a gross income of $36,216.90. On March 14, 1951, taxpayer was notified by so-called ninety day letter of a $2,577.01 deficiency, resulting from his failure to return an additional $10,000 of gross income. On later re-audit, this figure was recomputed to $11,817.43 and a final tax deficiency of $3,243.60 was asserted.
On May 7, 1951, taxpayer filed a timely petition for review of the deficiency in the Tax Court. During the pendency of these proceedings, the taxpayer died, and appellant Milo J. Shepard was appointed executor of the estate. On May 20, 1952, the executor consented to the immediate assessment and collection of the deficiency. Internal Revenue advised the executor that the waiver was ineffective to terminate the Tax Court proceedings, and requested a stipulation for the entry of judgment. A stipulation was signed and filed on June 12, 1952, and provided that the Tax Court should enter its decision finding a deficiency in taxpayer's 1947 return in the amount of $3,243.60. The stipulation further provided "that effective upon the entry of the Court's decision, petitioner waives the restrictions, if any, contained in the applicable internal revenue act or acts, on the assessment and collection of said deficiency, plus interest as provided by law."
On August 28, 1952, the Tax Court entered its decision pursuant to the stipulation. The assessment list was certified on October 16, 1952, the assessment was made on October 24, 1952, and this action for the collection of the tax was filed on October 23, 1958.
Section 275(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 19391 provides that income taxes must be assessed within three years after a return is filed. Appellant argues that the assessment on October 24, 1952 was therefore untimely. Under Section 275(c) however, the limitations period is extended to five years if the taxpayer omits from his return an amount in excess of 25 per cent of the amount of gross income shown in the return. We...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Webb v. Commissioner
...upon vitiate this Court's jurisdiction. United States v. Shepard's Estate, 196 F. Supp. 281, 284, affirmed as modified on other issues 319 F.2d 699. [Emphasis See also Estate of Jones v. Commissioner [86-2 USTC ¶ 1113,675], 795 F.2d 566, 573 (6th Cir. 1986), affg. [Dec. 40,973(M)] T.C. Memo......
-
Bowser v. Commissioner
...v. Shepard's Estate 61-2 USTC ¶ 9594, 196 F. Supp. 281, 284 (N.D.N.Y. 1961), affirmed as modified on other issues 63-2 USTC ¶ 9569 319 F. 2d 699 (C.A. 2, 1963); and Nash Miami Motors, Inc. v. Commissioner 66-1 USTC ¶ 9354, 358 F. 2d 636 (C.A. 5, 1966), Dec. 26,948(M) affirming a Memorandum ......
-
Security Indus. Ins. Co. v. U.S.
...finds support for its position in the two opinions in United States v. Shepard's Estate, 196 F.Supp. 281 (N.D.N.Y.1961), aff'd, 319 F.2d 699 (2d Cir.1963). We do not find the opinions in Shepard's Estate to be particularly useful, since they were concerned with an entirely different issue; ......
-
PERSHING v. Commissioner
...Shepards' Estate 61-2 USTC ¶ 9594, 196 F. Supp. 281, 284 (N.D. N.Y. 1961), affirmed as modified on other issues 63-2 USTC ¶ 9569 319 F. 2d 699 (C.A. 2, 1963); and Nash Miami Motors, Inc. v. Commissioner 66-1 USTC ¶ 9354, 358 F. 2d 636 (C.A. 5, 1966), affirming a Memorandum Opinion of this C......