United States v. Shyvers

Decision Date27 November 1967
Docket NumberDocket 31581.,No. 181,181
Citation385 F.2d 837
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Theodore V. SHYVERS, Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

Frederic A. Johnson, New York City (Rudolph Lion Zalowitz, Elizabeth, N. J., on the brief), for appellant.

Lars I. Kulleseid, Asst. U. S. Atty., So. District of N. Y. (Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., and John E. Sprizzo, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

Before WATERMAN, FRIENDLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Theodore V. Shyvers was convicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, after a two-day trial before Judge Weinfeld and a jury, on both counts of an indictment charging him and a co-defendant, Beatrice Motte, with concealing approximately 930 grams of heroin hydrochloride in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 173 and 174, and with concealing four marihuana cigarettes in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a. Judge Weinfeld directed a verdict of acquittal as to defendant Motte. Appellant was sentenced to five years imprisonment. He now appeals, contending that his arrest and the accompanying search and seizure were without probable cause.

Charles J. Leya, Jr., an agent of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, testified at trial that he had been engaged in surveillance of the activities of the appellant Shyvers on the nights of October 19, 20 and 21, 1965. He observed Shyvers on each of those nights meeting with various people and conversing with them, then later passing aluminum or silver foil packages to people at other meeting places. The cars which the recipients of the packages on the night of October 20 were driving had been parked in the vicinity of the first meeting of the night before. On the night of October 20, Leya observed the defendant Motte with Shyvers when packages were being passed; later Leya followed Shyvers and Motte to a motel in Yonkers, where he ascertained the number of the room in which the two appeared to be staying. The next night Leya and other officers arrested Shyvers and Motte as they entered the motel room. A search revealed four marihuana cigarettes on Shyvers' person, and 250 bundles of 25 glassine envelopes, each envelope containing a white powder later identified as heroin hydrochloride. Leya's testimony was corroborated by that of two detectives of the New York City Police Dept., Narcotics Bureau.

On the day before trial, after a hearing, Judge Weinfeld denied the defendants' motion to suppress the evidence seized by agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics at the time of the arrest. At the hearing on the motion to suppress, Agent Leya testified that he had observed Shyvers and other customers meet with three men subsequently arrested in possession of approximately two kilograms of heroin, the meetings taking place in pairs, one for an exchange of money and the second for receipt by the customer of an aluminum foil package of heroin.

Leya further testified that a few weeks after the arrest of the three men from whom he had observed Shyvers buying heroin he was informed by two reliable informants that after his arrest, the ringleader of the operation asked his "close friend" Shyvers to take it over. He was also informed, he said, about the activities of Shyvers which he witnessed on October 19, 20 and 21 — he was able to establish surveillance of the bars used as meeting places through this information. And shortly before the arrest of Shyvers, Leya...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • U.S. v. Levy
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • January 31, 1984
    ...to arrest upon "reasonable grounds" to believe felony committed states the constitutional standard of probable cause); United States v. Shyvers, 385 F.2d 837 (2d Cir.1967) (narcotics agent's arrest on probable cause found valid and evidence seized therein found admissible), cert. denied, 39......
  • United States v. Comissiong
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • July 30, 1970
    ...brought forth which would otherwise establish probable cause," 380 F.2d at 212.8 The Tucker rule was followed in United States v. Shyvers, 385 F.2d 837 (2 Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 998, 88 S.Ct. 1203, 20 L.Ed.2d 98 (1968); United States v. Cappabianca, 398 F.2d 356, 358-359 (2 Cir.)......
  • Foster v. Maryland State Sav. and Loan Ass'n
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • June 12, 1978
    ... ... MARYLAND STATE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION ... No. 76-1455 ... United States Court of Appeals, ... District of Columbia Circuit ... Argued 27 Oct. 1977 ... Decided ... ...
  • United States v. Gazard Colon
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • December 11, 1969
    ...386 U.S. 300, 87 S.Ct. 1056, 18 L.Ed.2d 62 (1967); United States v. Tucker, 380 F.2d 206, 211-214 (2 Cir. 1967); United States v. Shyvers, 385 F.2d 837, 839 (2 Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 998, 88 S.Ct. 1203, 20 L.Ed.2d 98, rehearing denied 390 U.S. 1046, 88 S.Ct. 1640, 20 L.Ed.2d 311......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT