United States v. Silverstein
| Decision Date | 11 May 1965 |
| Docket Number | Docket 29538.,No. 470,470 |
| Citation | 344 F.2d 1016 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Harry G. SILVERSTEIN, Respondent-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Stephen Charnas, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, and Laurence Vogel, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for petitioner-appellee.
Jules Ritholz, New York City (Boris Kostelanetz and Raymond Rubin, Corcoran, Kostelanetz & Gladstone, New York City, on the brief), for respondent-appellant.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and FRIENDLY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
We affirm the order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York which directed Harry G. Silverstein to comply with an Internal Revenue summons and to produce the book and records of two real estate syndicates, Model City B Associates and Model City C Associates. We agree with the reasons stated by Judge Bryan in his opinion, reported at 237 F.Supp. 446 (1965). As Judge Bryan pointed out, the real estate syndicates here involved are very similar to the real estate syndicates involved in the earlier case of United States v. Silverstein, 210 F.Supp. 401 (1962), aff'd by us, 314 F.2d 789, cert. denied, 374 U.S. 807, 83 S.Ct. 1696, 10 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1963), where Judge Tyler directed this same respondent to produce the records of those syndicates.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Cogan, M 11 188.
... ... 370, 50 L.Ed. 652 (1906), is available to him as a member of the partnerships in question, characterized by the Government as "impersonal enterprises."1 "The inquiry is, therefore, essentially a factual one into the nature of 257 F. Supp. 171 the particular entity." United States v. Silverstein", 314 F.2d 789, 791 (2d Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 807, 83 S. Ct. 1695, 10 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1963). The materials for the inquiry—in effect stipulated through an affidavit of respondent's counsel which the Government accepts as correct for present purposes— are as follows: ... \xC2" ... ...
-
Pawgan v. Silverstein, 66 Civ. 3351.
...265 F. Supp. 898 ... Martin PAWGAN et al., Plaintiffs, ... Larry A. SILVERSTEIN et al., Defendants ... No. 66 Civ. 3351 ... United States District Court S. D. New York ... March 30, 1967.265 F. Supp. 899 Harvey M. Sklaver and Schwartz & Frank, New York City, for ... ...