United States v. State of Louisiana
| Citation | 76 S.Ct. 1043,100 L.Ed. 1494,351 U.S. 978 |
| Decision Date | 11 June 1956 |
| Docket Number | No. 15,O,15 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, plaintiff, v. STATE OF LOUISIANA. riginal |
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
Attorney General Brownell, Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Rankin, Messrs. Oscar H. Davis and John F. Davis, for the United States.
Messrs. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen., Edward M. Carmouche, John L. Madden, Special Asst. Attys. Gen., W. Scott Wilkinson and Bailey Walsh, for defendant State of Louisiana.
Upon consideration of the motion of the United States for an injunction or other interlocutory relief in cases involving the controversy pending before this Court in the case of United States of America v. State of Louisiana,
It is ordered that the Attorney General of the State of Louisiana and others named and others acting with them are enjoined from further prosecuting or taking any proceedings in a certain cause now pending in the Fourteenth Judicial District Court in and for the Parish of Calcasieu, State of Louisiana, entitled State of Louisiana v. Anderson—Prichard Oil Corporation, et al., Number 38780 on the docket of said court, and from prosecuting any other case or cases involving the controversy before this Court until further order of the Court, and
It is further ordered that the State of Louisiana and the United States of America are enjoined from leasing or beginning the drilling of new wells in the disputed tidelands area pending further order of this Court unless by agreement of the parties filed here.
The CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Department & Specialty Store Emp. Union v. Brown
....... No. 16843. . United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. . November 15, 1960. . As Amended ... the granting of injunctive relief; and (3) the complaint failed to state a cause of action. The District Court allowed appellee's motion and ......
-
Federal Communications Commission v. Cohn
....... United States District Court S. D. New York. . September 5, 1957. 154 F. Supp. ......
-
United States v. State of Louisiana
...were parties to the action there. United States v. Louisiana, 351 U.S. 946, 76 S.Ct. 842, 100 L.Ed. 1471 again at 351 U.S. 978, 76 S.Ct. 1043, 100 L.Ed. 1494 (1956). In that case, as reflected by the first memorandum of the Supreme Court, the Court "In the meantime the parties are invited t......
-
United States v. Louisiana
...the drilling of new wells in the disputed tidelands area . . . unless by agreement of the parties filed here." 351 U.S. 978, 76 S.Ct. 1043, 100 L.Ed. 1494 (1956). In response to this ruling, on October 12, 1956, the parties entered into an Interim Agreement designed to permit further develo......