United States v. State of California

Decision Date27 October 1947
Docket NumberNo. 12,O,12
Citation68 S.Ct. 20,92 L.Ed. 382,332 U.S. 804
PartiesUNITED STATES v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. riginal
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

Since our opinion which was announced in this case June 23, 1947, 332 U.S. 19, 67 S.Ct. 1658, two stipulations have been filed in this Court, signed by the Attorney General and Secretary of the Interior of the United States on the one hand and by the Attorney General of the State of California on the other hand. In these stipulations the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Interior purport to renounce and disclaim for the United States Government paramount government power over certain particularly described submerged lands in the California coastal area. In such stipulations the United States Attorney General and Secretary of the Interior furthermore purport to bind the United States to agreements which purport to authorize state lessees of California coastal submerged lands to continue to occupy and exploit those lands, and which agreements also purport to authorize California under conditions set out to execute leases for other submerged coastal lands.

Robert E. Lee Jordan has filed a petition in this Court praying that he be permitted to file a motion as amicus curiae or in the alternative as an intervenor to have the foregoing stipulations and agreements set aside and declared null and void on the ground among others that the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Interior are without authority to bind the United States by agreements which it is alleged would if valid alienate and surrender the Government's paramount power over the submerged lands concerning which the stipulations are made.

It is ordered that the petition of Robert E. Lee Jordan to file the motion here to declare the stipulations null and void be denied, without prejudice to the assertion of any right he may have in a proper district court.

It is further ordered that the stipulations between the United States Attorney General and the Secretary of the Interior on the one hand and the Attorney General of California on the other, which stipulations purport to bind the United States, be stricken as irrelevant to any issues now before us.

And for the purpose of carrying into effect the conclusions of this Court as stated in its opinion announced June 23, 1947, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed as follows:

1. The United States of America is now, and has been at all times pertinent hereto, possessed of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
35 cases
  • United States v. Stoeco Homes, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • June 13, 1973
    ...mistaken assumptions. United States v. California, 332 U.S. 19, 39-40, 67 S.Ct. 1658, 91 L. Ed. 1889, Opinion Supplemented, 332 U.S. 804, 68 S.Ct. 20, 92 L.Ed. 382, reh. den., 332 U.S. 787 (1947), pet. den., 334 U.S. 855, 68 S.Ct. 1517, 92 L.Ed. 1776 The defense of a denial of equal protect......
  • Mass. Lobstermen's Ass'n v. Ross
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • October 5, 2018
    ...to establish the Channel Islands National Monument. See 436 U.S. at 36, 98 S.Ct. 1662 (discussing United States v. California, 332 U.S. 804, 805, 68 S.Ct. 20, 92 L.Ed. 382 (1947) ). Even Plaintiffs appear not to contest that the federal government controls the territorial sea. Yet that cont......
  • Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. Bradshaw
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • December 19, 1996
    ...Court's opinion in United States v. California (1947) 332 U.S. 19, 67 S.Ct. 1658, 91 L.Ed. 1889 (supplemental opn. at 332 U.S. 804, 68 S.Ct. 20, 92 L.Ed. 382). In that case, the State of California and the United States disputed the ownership of the land, and more significantly the minerals......
  • Cobb Coin v. UNIDENT., WRECKED & ABAN. SAIL. VESSEL
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • October 2, 1981
    ...three nautical miles * * *. The State of California has no title thereto or property interest therein. United States v. California, 332 U.S. 804, 805, 68 S.Ct. 20, 21, 92 L.Ed. 382 (1947). The "paramount rights" of the federal government, however, were thereafter ceded to the states through......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT