United States v. State of Washington, Civ. No. 9213—Phase I.
Decision Date | 30 June 1978 |
Docket Number | Civ. No. 9213—Phase I. |
Citation | 459 F. Supp. 1020 |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE of WASHINGTON et al., Defendants. |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Stan Pitkin, U. S. Atty., J. Ronald Sim, James C. Waldo, Harry J. McCarthy, Asst. U. S. Attys., Seattle, Wash., George D. Dysart, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for United States.
Alvin J. Ziontz, Mason D. Morisset, Ziontz, Pirtle, Morisset, Ernstoff & Chestnut, Seattle, Wash., for Quileute, Makah and Lummi Tribes.
Alan C. Stay, Thomas P. Schlosser, John H. Sennhauser, Evergreen Legal Services, Seattle, Wash., for Sauk-Suiattle, Samish, Snohomish, Steilacoom, Stillaguamish, Nooksack, Suquamish, Nisqually, Muckleshoot, Squaxin Island, Skokomish, Lower Elwha, Snoqualmie and Upper Skagit Tribes.
Lewis A. Bell, Bell, Ingram & Rice, Everett, Wash., for Tulalip Tribes.
Michael Taylor, Tahola, Wash., for Quinault Tribe.
John Clinebell, Tacoma, Wash., William H. Rodgers, Jr., Washington, D. C., for Puyallup Tribe.
Harwood Bannister, Bannister, Bruhn & Cunningham, Mt. Vernon, Wash., for Swinomish Tribe.
Slade Gorton, Atty. Gen., James M. Johnson, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Dennis Reynolds, Asst. Atty. Gen., Olympia, Wash., for defendantState of Washington.
COMPILATION OF MAJOR POST-TRIAL SUBSTANTIVE ORDERS (Through June 30, 1978).
(Through June 30, 1978)
The initial decision of the court dated February 12, 1974, (hereinafter Final Decision # 1) and related rulings and decree of March 22, 1974, in this case are set forth at 384 F.Supp. 312(aff'd520 F.2d 676(9th Cir.1975), cert. denied,423 U.S. 1086, 96 S.Ct. 877, 47 L.Ed.2d 97, rehearing denied424 U.S. 978, 96 S.Ct. 1487, 47 L.Ed.2d 750(1976)).Under the court's retention of continuing jurisdiction, subsequent decisions and orders of a substantive nature rendered through June 30, 1978, are set forth or summarized below.All summarizations or editing herein of the provisions as entered, are by the court.1
Subsequent to Final Decision # 1 herein, the following parties were allowed to intervene as additional plaintiffs: Duwamish, Jamestown Band Clallam, Lower Elwha Band Clallam, Nooksack, Port Gamble Band Clallam, Samish, Snohomish, Snoqualmie, Steilacoom, Suquamish, Swinomish, Aboriginal Swinomish and Tulalip Tribes.The Nisqually and Puyallup Tribes which had only been represented by the United States, were allowed to intervene on their own behalf.Applications to intervene as additional defendants by the Northwest Steelheaders' Council of Trout Unlimited, Gary Ellis its president, Purse Seine Vessel Owners Association and Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Association were denied.
By separate order the court appointed United States Magistrate Robert E. Cooper as Master and Dr. Richard R. Whitney2 as fisheries science and management advisor to assist the court.A Fisheries Advisory Board was established as set forth, infra.
(September 12, 1974)
Paragraph 5 of the Interim Plan and Stay Order entered by this court on March 22, 1974(384 F.Supp. at 420), obligates defendantsState of Washington, Washington Department of Game and its Director and Washington Department of Fisheries and its Director, (hereinafter "defendants") to make significant reductions in the non-Indian fishery as deemed necessary to achieve the objectives of the court's definition of Indian treaty fishing rights.In carrying out this order the court anticipated that defendants would promulgate and enforce regulations reducing the non-Indian fishery.Defendants have promulgated certain regulations establishing reductions in the non-Indian fishery but have been unable to enforce them by reason of certain directives and orders of the Thurston County Superior Court in Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Association v. Tollefson,No. 50380, Washington Kelpers Association v. Tollefson,No. 50552andPuget Sound Gillnetters Association v....
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
United States v. Washington
...It possesses adjudicated off-reservation treaty fishing rights. United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. at 374–75, FF. 120, 121; 459 F.Supp. 1020, 1097 (1978), aff'd , 573 F.2d 1123, 1130–32 (9th Cir.1978) ; 626 F.Supp. 1405, 1492, 1494 (W.D.Wash.1985), aff'd , 761 F.2d 1419 (9th Cir.1985)......
-
United States v. State of Washington
...in which this Court has been asked to determine the rights of one tribe as against another. See, e.g., United States v. Washington (Lower Elwha Tribe), 459 F.Supp. 1020, 1066 (1976), aff'd, 642 F.2d 1141 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862, 102 S.Ct. 320, 70 L.Ed.2d 161 4. This Court......
-
United States v. State of Mich.
...movements in the state courts attacking his decision concerning the fisheries in Washington, wrote the following decision, 459 F.Supp. 1020, 1028 (W.D.Wash.1978), which was appealed and affirmed in Washington v. Fishing Vessel Ass'n, 443 U.S. 658, 99 S.Ct. 3055, 61 L.Ed.2d 823 DECISION, INJ......
-
Resident Advisory Bd. v. Rizzo
... ... Frank L. RIZZO et al ... Civ. A. No. 71-1575 ... United States District ... 1083 (1955); United States v. State of Washington, 459 F.Supp. 1020, 1115 ... ...
-
Case summaries.
...42 (9th Cir. 1981). (256) Albuquerque v. Browner, 97 F.3d 415, 423 (10th Cir. 1996). (257) 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash. 1974). (258) 459 F. Supp. 1020 (W.D. Wash. (259) 384 F. Supp. at 419. (260) Id. at 398. (261) Id. at 360. (262) Id. (263) For further discussion of United States v. Washin......