United States v. Stith

Decision Date12 August 1966
Docket NumberCrim. No. 800-64.
Citation261 F. Supp. 401
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Benjamin F. STITH, Jr., Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Columbia

The Application of Lawrence C. Moore, Esquire, for Compensation under the Criminal Justice Act

BAZELON, Chief Circuit Judge.

Counsel appeared in court for a total period of time of 37 hours which included trial time as well as time spent for mental competency hearing. The trial judge approved counsel's request for payment at the maximum rates of $15 per hour for court appearances and $10 per hour for 52.5 hours spent in preparation for a total of $1075 plus expenses.

In order to exceed the statutory limitation of $500 for any case, the services must be rendered in "protracted representation." 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(d) (1964). Since I am unable to find that the services here were rendered in "protracted representation," within the meaning of the statute, I am constrained to return the file to the district court, without my approval, so that it may be forwarded for payment for services in the sum not to exceed $500 plus legal expenses. See United States v. Moore, 258 F.Supp. 790 (D.C.D.C.1966); United States v. Lowrey, 261 F.Supp. 396, U.S. D.C.1966; United States v. Rountree, 254 F.Supp. 1009 (S.D.N.Y.1966); United States v. Dodge, 260 F.Supp. 929, S.D.N.Y.1966; United States v. Whitney, 65 Crim. 160, S.D.N.Y. filed March 30, 1966; United States of America v. Owens et al., 256 F.Supp. 861, W.D.Pa., 1966.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • State v. Borst, 40967
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • December 1, 1967
    ...a sentence of 6 months was imposed. In the Arbo case, involving nine violations of the same statute, the Federal District Court said (261 F.Supp. 401): '* * * It would be a gross perversion of solid constitutional doctrine to find a rational distinction between one year in jail (a misdemean......
  • United States v. James
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas
    • March 26, 1969
    ...v. Randolph, 35 Ill.2d 24, 219 N.E.2d 337 (1966). Compare United States v. Thomas, 261 F.Supp. 431 (D.D. C.1966); United States v. Stith, 261 F. Supp. 401 (D.D.C.1966); United States v. Lowery, 261 F.Supp. 396 (D.D.C. 1966); United States v. Moore, 258 F. Supp. 790 (D.D.C.1966); United Stat......
  • People v. Perry
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • February 21, 1967
    ... ... not allowed ... U.S. v. Stith 261 F.Supp. 401 37 55 1/2 Excess ... (W.D.Pa., 1966) ...         The attorney states that he spent 40 hours in open court and 12 hours in preparation. Additionally, his expenses ...         In United States v. Owens (256 F.Supp. 861 (W.D.Pa., 1966)), an attorney spent 40 hours in open court and 36 ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT