United States v. Surratt, Jr.
| Docket Number | 14-6851 |
| Decision Date | 31 July 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
131 cases
-
United States v. Wheeler
...Simmons and Miller could not pass through the savings clause and have his § 2241 petition heard on the merits. See United States v. Surratt , 797 F.3d 240, 269 (4th Cir. 2015), reh'g en banc granted , Dec. 2, 2015. The majority in Surratt distinguished our decision in In re Jones , which gr......
-
Wright v. Spaulding
...process every time the Supreme Court overturns circuit precedent is atextual, illogical, and unworkable. See United States v. Surratt , 797 F.3d 240, 251–55, 257–263 (4th Cir. 2015), vacated on grant of reh'g en banc , appeal dismissed as moot , 855 F.3d 218 (4th Cir. 2017) ; Samak v. Warde......
-
Hueso v. Barnhart
...begs the question: quis custodiet ipsos custodies? Who will guard the guards themselves? United States v. Surratt , 797 F.3d 240, 276 (4th Cir. 2015) (Gregory, J., dissenting), pet. for reh’g en banc granted , (4th Cir. Dec. 2, 2015).8 The majority opinion provides no answers to Chief Judge......
-
McCarthan v. Dir. of Goodwill Indus.-Suncoast, Inc.
...in a habeas corpus proceeding." (quotations and citations omitted and alterations adopted)). See also United States v. Surratt , 797 F.3d 240, 274 (4th Cir. 2015) (Gregory, J., dissenting), reh'g en banc granted (Dec. 2, 2015) (" § 2255 is 'inadequate or ineffective' when the retroactively-......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
ADEQUATE AND EFFECTIVE: POSTCONVICTION RELIEF THROUGH SECTION 2255 AND INTERVENING CHANGES IN LAW.
...rule of constitutional law, made retroactive... by the Supreme Court" to certify a second or successive motion. United States v. Surratt, 797 F.3d 240, 259 (4th Cir. 2015) (quoting [section] 2255(h)(2)), vacated on grant of reh'g en banc, appeal dismissed as moot, 855 F.3d 218 (4th Cir. (66......