United States v. Texas, 15–674.
Decision Date | 19 January 2016 |
Docket Number | No. 15–674.,15–674. |
Citation | 193 L.Ed.2d 788,136 S.Ct. 906 (Mem),577 U.S. 1101 |
Parties | UNITED STATES, et al., petitioners, v. TEXAS, et al. |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
577 U.S. 1101
136 S.Ct. 906 (Mem)
193 L.Ed.2d 788
UNITED STATES, et al., petitioners,
v.
TEXAS, et al.
No. 15–674.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jan. 19, 2016.
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted. In addition to the questions presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: "Whether the Guidance violates the Take Care Clause of the Constitution, Art. II, § 3."
To continue reading
Request your trial17 cases
-
In re Border Infrastructure Envtl. Litig., Case No.: 17cv1215–GPC(WVG)
...Art. II, § 3, personally and through officers whom he appoints....") Moreover, when the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. Texas, it, sua sponte , asked for additional briefing on "Whether the Guidance27 violates the Take Care Clause of the Constitution, Art. II, 3." Unite......
-
Casa De Md. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.
...thereof in his official capacity").23 See also Texas v. United States , 809 F.3d 134, 165–170 (5th Cir. 2015), aff'd , ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 906, 193 L.Ed.2d 788 (2016).Congress did not intend to make immune from judicial review an agency action that reclassifies millions of illegal alie......
-
Bauer v. Elrich
...for such eligibility. 8 U.S.C. § 1621(d) ; see also Texas v. U.S. , 809 F.3d 134, 148-49 (5th Cir. 2015), aff'd , 577 U.S. 1101, 136 S.Ct. 906, 193 L.Ed.2d 788 (2016) ("Unlawfully present aliens are generally not eligible to receive ... state and local public benefits unless the state other......
-
Ariz. Dream Act Coal. v. Brewer
...recent ruling in Texas v. United States, 809 F.3d 134 (5th Cir. 2015)petition for cert. granted sub nom. United States v. Texas, ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 906, 193 L.Ed.2d 788 (2015) (mem.), is also inapposite to Defendants' constitutional claims. There, several states challenged the Deferre......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Article II judges: section 238's violation of separation of powers
...bias); see also Jain, supra note 67, at 300 (raising a similar point about immigration judges). 217. See United States v. Texas, 577 U.S. 1101 (2016) (mem.); Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Ctr., Inc., 575 U.S. 320, 326 (2015); Blumenthal v. Trump, 373 F. Supp. 3d 191 (D.D.C. 2019); see also......
-
The Future of Administrative Law
...and ordered the case to trial. Texas v. United States, 809 F.3d 134, 146 (5th Cir. 2015), as revised (Nov. 25, 2015), cert. granted , 136 S. Ct. 906, 193 L. Ed. 2d 788 (2016). he entirety of the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. Texas reads Copyright © 2017 Environmental Law Insti......
-
EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY AND THE TAKE CARE CLAUSE.
...[hereinafter DACA Cancellation Memorandum], https://www.dhs.gov/news/2017/09/05/memorandum-rescission-daca. (14) United States v. Texas, 136 S. Ct. 906, 906 (2016) ("In addition to the questions presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: '......
-
The Judicial Response to the Presidential Polarization of the Administrative State
...States v. Mead Corp, 533 U.S. 218 (2001).United States v. Texas, 136 S. Ct. 906 (2016).United States v. Texas, No. 15-674 (2016). Retrieved from https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-674_jhlo.pdfU.S. Department of Education. (2014). U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil R......