United States v. Thompson Et Al
| Decision Date | 01 October 1876 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES v. THOMPSON ET AL |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
ERROR to the Court of Appeals of the State Maryland.
In the progress of a suit pending in the Circuit Court of Queen Anne's County, Md., to settle the affairs of McFreely & Hopper, an insolvent partnership, and to collect and apply the assets of the firm to the payment of its liabilities, the United States presen ed a petition for the allowance of a claim in their favor, and its payment out of the fund in court in preference to other creditors, on account of the priority given to debts due the United States by the act of March 3, 1797. 1 Stat. 515, sect. 5; Rev. Stat. sect. 3466.
This petition was referred to an auditor, to take testimony, and report. The facts, as they appear in his report, are substantially as follows:——
Thompson, one of the appellees, was a deputy-collector of internal revenue for the first district of Maryland. In the course of his business he permitted McFreely & Hopper to dispose of and receive the money for internal-revenue stamps, which had been furnished him by the United States to sell. On a settlement with the firm, in December, 1865, there was found due him on that account between $1,500 and $1,600. During the same month of December he held checks received from various parties in payment of internal-revenue taxes, and these he indorsed and delivered to the firm to collect for him. The money was collected, and deposited in bank to the credit of the firm. Some time in February, 1866, the firm gave Thompson a check for $3,000, to pay the amount due him for stamps and checks,—viz., $2,537,—and an amount that was due to him on account of other transactions. With this check, and other checks and current notes, he obtained from the National Exchange Bank of Baltimore a certificate of deposit payable to the treasurer of the United States, for about $24,000. This was at once remitted to the treasurer, to whom it was afterwards paid. Some days after, the check of McFreely & Hopper was protested; and Thompson took it up from the National Exchange Bank, using therefor moneys belonging to the United States in his hands as deputy-collector. Sept. 1, 1866, McFreely & Hopper took up the check from him, paying in money all but $2,537, and giving him their note for that amount, with two sureties, payable one day after date.
This note Thompson presented for allowance, as a claim in his favor. The United States claimed, on account of the money originally received for the stamps sold and checks collected.
The auditor reported...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Dickerson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
...... Company was a common carrier by telegraph, under the laws of. the United States, and that the message upon which suit was. based was an interstate message from Tupelo, ...Ins. Co. v. Hendren, 92 U.S. 286, 23 L.Ed. 709;. United States v. Thompson, 93 U.S. 586, 23. L.Ed. 982. . . "In. the supreme court of Pennsylvania a further ......
-
Ward County v. Warren
......592; Wetherbee v. Green, 22 Mich. 318, 7 Am. Rep. 653; Moore v. Bowman, 47 N.H. 501; United. States v. Thompson, 93 U.S. 586, 23 L. ed. 982;. Diversey v. Johnson, 93 Ill. 569; Central ......
-
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Piper
......From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Judgment affirmed. . Thompson & Barwise, of Ft. Worth, and A. C. Wood, of Houston, for appellant. Williams & Smith and David B. .... "That by the act of Congress of the United States, approved June 18, 1910, Congress entered and assumed charge of regulating the field of ......
-
United States v. Choctaw, Okla. & Gulf R.R. Co.
......(The United States v. Thompson, 93 U.S. 586, 23 L. Ed. 982; The United States v. Union Pac. R. R. Co. 105 U.S. 263.) ¶12 And such exemption is not relied upon in this case, since the liability here discussed, has been provided against by the requirement made in behalf of the United States, and taken by those ......