United States v. Times Mirror Company

Decision Date11 October 1967
Docket NumberCiv. No. 65-366-F.
Citation274 F. Supp. 606
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. The TIMES MIRROR COMPANY, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Central District of California

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

Bernard M. Hollander, John W. Poole, Jr., Joseph A. Tate, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Julian O. von Kalinowski, Paul G. Bower, Los Angeles, Cal., Robert F. Erburu, Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel, for defendant.

OPINION

FERGUSON, District Judge.

This action was commenced on March 5, 1965, when the government filed its complaint in a civil action alleging that the acquisition on June 25, 1964, by The Times Mirror Company of all the shares of stock of The Sun Company for $15,000,000 violates the antitrust laws of the United States.

The government challenges the acquisition by the publisher of the largest daily newspaper in Southern California (the Los Angeles Times) of the largest independent daily newspaper publisher in Southern California (The Sun Company). It contends that Times Mirror's acquisition and ownership of the stock of The Sun Company constitutes an unlawful control and combination which unreasonably restrains interstate trade and commerce in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 11, and that the effect of the acquisition may be to substantially lessen competition in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18.2

The government seeks an order of divestiture and an injunction which would prohibit the defendant from purchasing any other newspaper in the relevant geographic market.

Venue is in this court by reason of the fact that The Times Mirror Company, a California corporation, transacts business in the Central District of California and has its principal office in Los Angeles. 15 U.S.C. § 22.

The Acquiring Company.

The Times Mirror Company is a highly diversified holding company with large interests in newspaper publishing, book publishing and commercial printing. Between 1960 and 1964, its total assets increased from $81,014,000 to $165,162,000, its revenues rose from $112,560,000 to $196,537,000 and its earnings after taxes more than doubled. A large part of its growth is attributed to a number of acquisitions.

When it acquired The Sun Company, Times Mirror published the Los Angeles Times, mornings and Sundays, and through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Orange Coast Publishing Company, published the Orange Coast Daily Pilot, an evening newspaper published in four editions in the beach area south of Los Angeles.

The Los Angeles Times, which is The Times Mirror Company's principal enterprise, has been in terms of circulation the largest daily newspaper published in California since 1948 (790,255 in 1964), and the largest Sunday newspaper since 1951 (1,122,143 in 1964). It has led all newspapers in the United States in total annual daily and Sunday advertising lineage since 1955 and in total annual editorial and feature matter lineage since 1951. It has advertising offices not only in California but also in Chicago and New York. It operates the Los Angeles Times Syndicate, which distributes and sells approximately 35 newspaper features in more than 1,000 publications throughout the world, and through the Los Angeles Times-Washington Post News Service, provides news to about 90 daily newspapers.

Although it is published in Los Angeles, it circulates in substantial numbers and is home delivered throughout Southern California, and maintains advertising offices and reporters, full and part-time, throughout.

As to syndicated features which it purchases, the Times has followed a policy of obtaining exclusive rights in the area of Santa Barbara on the north to San Diego on the south and to the Colorado River on the east; its policy has been and is to deny use of such features to other daily newspapers in its exclusive area.

In recent years, the Times has published five suburban or zone sections, each of which is distributed as part of the Times in a specific geographic area, their purpose being to compete with local newspapers in those areas for circulation and advertising. These suburban sections, which carry local news of the specific area in which they are distributed, also carry advertising at lower rates than are charged for the full run of the paper.

The Los Angeles Times is a newspaper with special focus on the interpretation of news and issues and specialization in financial news, entertainment, art, sports and special interest subjects. It has 17 exclusive bureaus in various parts of the world and 12 full-time reporters in the nation's capital, as well as national bureaus in such places as New York, Chicago, Atlanta, Houston, Sacramento and San Francisco.

The Acquired Company.

At the time of the acquisition, The Sun Company was the largest independent newspaper publishing company in Southern California. The company was located in San Bernardino County, which adjoins Los Angeles County to the east. It was locally owned, primarily by the Guthrie family, and none of its owners had significant interests in other newspapers. The Sun Company was not only a prosperous publisher with morning, evening and Sunday newspapers, but it also owned Acme Colorprint Company which supplies color comic printing to most of the Southern California Sunday newspapers.

The Sun Company was in sound financial condition with total assets of $4,551,261 and its net income from newspaper operations in 1964 exceeded $1,000,000. Each year from 1960 to 1964, its revenues from the operations of its newspapers and the Acme Colorprint Company approximated $8,000,000.

With its three newspapers, the morning Sun, the evening Telegram and the Sunday Sun-Telegram, The Sun Company dominated the daily newspaper business in San Bernardino County. The only difference between the Sun and the Telegram was that the first was published in the morning and the latter in the evening. Substantially, they were the same paper without change in editorial opinion, features or news. The combined weekday circulation of the Sun and the Telegram was nearly three times as large as that of the next largest daily published in the county and more than eight times as large as any other daily published there.

In 1964 the Sun was the only morning newspaper published daily in San Bernardino County. Its daily circulation was 53,802. The Sun-Telegram was the largest Sunday newspaper published there with a circulation of 70,664. They were the only newspapers other than the Los Angeles papers (the Times and the evening and Sunday Herald-Examiner) which were home delivered throughout San Bernardino County.

The Sun covered all of San Bernardino County with news and zone editions. In addition to a city zone for the City of San Bernardino and a free weekly advertising shopper, it distributed nine zone editions to specific areas of the county.

Both the morning Sun and the Sunday Sun-Telegram carried a substantial amount of state, national and international news, complete stock reports of the New York and American Stock Exchanges, national sports news, nationally known columnists, comics and other syndicated features, and Los Angeles television and radio logs. The Sun maintained editorial and advertising offices in the larger communities of San Bernardino County and purchased the whole of the county as exclusive territory for certain of its syndicated features.

The Acquisition.

Negotiations for the acquisition of The Sun Company by the defendant extended over several years on a sporadic basis. They were first begun by Norman Chandler, Chief Executive of Times Mirror, in 1962 when he contacted his long-time friend, James A. Guthrie, to inquire as to whether Mr. Guthrie was interested in selling. Mr. Chandler was interested in The Sun Company because it had a fine reputation and it was in a growth area that in the long run would prove to be a good investment. Mr. Guthrie was not interested. Subsequently, however, he informed Mr. Chandler that if he received an offer which was high enough he would consider selling. Further negotiations ensued, culminating in an offer of an exchange of stock which was not accepted.

In 1964 negotiations were resumed and a proposal was made by Times Mirror for $12.5 million in cash which was refused. In June, 1964, the Pulitzer Publishing Company of St. Louis made a cash offer to Mr. Guthrie of $15 million.

Mr. Guthrie realized the $15 million offer of Pulitzer could not be ignored. However, he preferred that The Sun Company be sold to Times Mirror for a number of reasons. First, he felt that the interests of Times Mirror and The Sun Company in the development of the West were the same. Second, Norman Chandler was a director of three of the largest corporations in San Bernardino County: Kaiser Steel Corporation, The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad and Safeway Stores, Inc. Third, he treasured the friendship that existed between the Chandler family and his family beginning in the days of General Otis. Finally, he disapproved of the Pulitzer policies and politics.

Because of the Pulitzer offer, Mr. Guthrie, Sr., asked his son, James K. Guthrie, to call Otis Chandler, Norman Chandler's son and the publisher of the Times, and inform him that an offer of $15 million had been made to purchase the newspaper and to say that if Times Mirror were truly interested they had better move quickly. Mr. Guthrie had made the decision to sell because of advice concerning his estate planning.

As a result of James K. Guthrie's phone call on June 20, 1964, Norman Chandler went to San Bernardino and conferred with Mr. Guthrie, Sr., at the latter's home. Mr. Guthrie told Mr. Chandler that he had received an offer of $15 million from the Pulitzers. Mr. Chandler stated, "We will meet the price of $15 million". They shook hands and five days later the sale was formally completed.

Jurisdiction.

The Times Mirror Company and The Sun Company are now and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • September 23, 1974
    ...Co., 280 F.Supp. 978, 985-987 (D. Ariz.1968), aff'd, 394 U.S. 131, 89 S.Ct. 927, 22 L.Ed.2d 148 (1969), and United States v. Times Mirror Co., 274 F.Supp. 606, 617 (C.D.Cal.1967), aff'd mem., 390 U.S. 712, 88 S.Ct. 1411, 20 L.Ed. 252 (1968). It is clear, however, that in each of the cited c......
  • Community Publishers, Inc. v. Donrey Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Arkansas
    • June 30, 1995
    ...978 (D.Ariz.1968), aff'd, 394 U.S. 131, 89 S.Ct. 927, 22 L.Ed.2d 148 (1969) (Section 7 of the Clayton Act); United States v. Times Mirror Co., 274 F.Supp. 606 (C.D.Cal.1967), aff'd, 390 U.S. 712, 88 S.Ct. 1411, 20 L.Ed.2d 252 (1968) (Section 7 of the Clayton Although this court has made its......
  • Bowen v. New York News, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • August 23, 1973
    ...280 F.Supp. 978, 985-987 (D.Ariz. 1968), aff'd, 394 U.S. 131, 89 S.Ct. 927, 22 L.Ed.2d 148 (1969); United States v. Times Mirror Company, 274 F.Supp. 606, 617 (C. D.Cal.1967), aff'd mem., 390 U.S. 712, 88 S. Ct. 1411, 20 L.Ed.2d 252 (1968). It is true that in some of the services which they......
  • BUFFALO COURIER-EXP., INC. v. Buffalo Evening News, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • November 9, 1977
    ...the Sunday newspaper market as a sub-market separate and distinct from the weekday market is recognized in United States v. Times Mirror Company, 272 274 F.Supp. 606 (C.D.Cal. 1967), aff'd. 390 U.S. 12 712, 88 S.Ct. 1411, 20 L.Ed.2d 252 (1971)." (Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum, p. "`Wi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 books & journal articles
  • Philadelphia National Bank: Bad Economics, Bad Law, Good Riddance
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Antitrust Law Journal No. 80-2, June 2015
    • June 1, 2015
    ...360 F. Supp. 741 (D. Del. 1973); Luria Brothers & Co. v. FTC, 389 F.2d 847, 864–65 (3d Cir. 1968); United States v. Times Mirror Co., 274 F. Supp. 606, 622 (C.D. Cal. 1967); United States v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., 258 F. Supp. 36, 64–65 (S.D.N.Y. 1966). Other courts have understood PNB as hol......
  • Conglomerate Mergers
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Mergers and Acquisitions. Understanding the Antitrust Issues. Fourth Edition
    • December 6, 2015
    ...until Congress broadens the criteria, the Court must judge proposed transactions on that standard.”); United States v. Times Mirror Co., 274 F. Supp. 606, 613-14 (C.D. Cal. 1967), aff’d , 390 U.S. 712 (1968). 14 . See, e.g ., Hearings on Economic Concentration before the Subcomm. on Antitru......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • ABA Archive Editions Library Mergers and Acquisitions: Understanding the Antitrust Issues, 2d Edition
    • January 1, 2004
    ...390 U.S. 171 (1968), 207, 223 United States v. Thomson Corp., 949 F. Supp. 907 (D.D.C. 1996), 103 United States v. Times Mirror Co., 274 F. Supp. 606 (C.D. Cal. 1967), aff’d , 390 U.S. 712 (1967), 376 United States v. Topco Associates, 1973-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) ¶ 74,391 (N.D. Ill. 1972), as a......
  • Chapter 11. Conglomerate Mergers
    • United States
    • ABA Archive Editions Library Mergers and Acquisitions: Understanding the Antitrust Issues, 2d Edition
    • January 1, 2004
    ...until Congress broadens the criteria, the Court must judge proposed transactions on that standard”); United States v. Times Mirror Co., 274 F. Supp. 606, 613-14 (C.D. Cal. 1967), aff’d , 390 U.S. 712 (1967). 19. See, e.g. , Staff of Federal Trade Comm’n, Economic Report on Corporate Mergers......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT