United States v. Tiplitz
| Decision Date | 09 February 1953 |
| Docket Number | No. 10862.,10862. |
| Citation | 202 F.2d 60 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES v. TIPLITZ. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
Meyer Rothwacks, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., (Grover C. Richman, Jr., U. S. Atty. and Charles J. Tyne, Asst. U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.
George R. Sommer, Newark, N. J. (David Tiplitz, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellant.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and GOODRICH and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.
The United States has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in this case on the ground that the order appealed from D.C., 105 F. Supp. 512, is not an appealable order within the purview of Sections 1291 and 1292, Title 28, U.S.C. The order was one denying a motion to dismiss the indictment. See Atlantic Fishermen's Union, etc., v. United States, 1 Cir., 195 F.2d 1021 and Atlantic Fishermen's Union, etc., v. United States, 1 Cir., 197 F.2d 519. Since the order clearly is not an appealable one the motion to dismiss will be granted and the appeal will be dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Golden
...6 Cir., 153 F.2d 353, certiorari denied sub nom. Gould v. United States, 328 U.S. 848, 66 S.Ct. 1120, 90 L.Ed. 1622; United States v. Tiplitz, 3 Cir., 202 F.2d 60. The appellant cites our decisions in Hotch v. United States, 9 Cir., 212 F.2d 280, and United States v. Hartman, 2 Cir., 209 F.......
-
State v. Morse
...102, 107, 64 S.Ct. 890, 88 L.Ed. 1163 (1944); United States v. Tiplitz, 105 F.Supp. 512, 513--514 (D.N.J.1952), appeal dismissed 202 F.2d 60 (3 Cir. 1953); State by State Highway Com'r v. Dilley, 48 N.J. 383, 387, 226 A.2d 1 (1967); State v. Hotel Bar Foods Inc., 18 N.J. 115, 128, 112 A.2d ......
-
State v. Strickland
...102, 107, 64 S.Ct. 890, 88 L.Ed. 1163 (1944); United States v. Tiplitz, 105 F.Supp. 512, 513--514 (D.N.J.1952), appeal dismissed 202 F.2d 60 (3 Cir. 1953); State by State Highway Com'r v. Dilley, 48 N.J. 383, 387, 226 A.2d 1 (1967); State v. Hotel Bar Foods, Inc., 18 N.J. 115, 128, 112 A.2d......
-
Snodgrass v. United States
...Clearly, the denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment is not an appealable order either under § 1291 or § 1292. United States v. Tiplitz, 3 Cir., 202 F.2d 60; United States v. Golden, 2 Cir., 239 F.2d 877; Chereton v. United States, 6 Cir., 256 F.2d 576; Atlantic Fishermen's Union, etc.,......