United States v. Torbert
Decision Date | 01 March 2021 |
Docket Number | Case No. 1:19-cr-31 |
Citation | 522 F.Supp.3d 377 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Oscar TORBERT, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio |
Karl Paul Kadon, III, United States Attorney's Office, Cincinnati, OH, for Plaintiff.
Mary Jill Hugan, Cincinnati, OH, for Defendant.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Suppress Fruits of Search Warrant (Doc. 40) and Amended Motion to Suppress Fruits of Search Warrant (Doc. 47). The United States opposes these motions (Docs. 42, 49). In addition, the Court previously concluded that Defendant had made the preliminary showing entitling him to an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware , 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978). (Doc. 51.) The Court conducted the hearing on February 1, 2021.
A grand jury indicted Defendant Oscar Torbert on charges of possession of fentanyl with intent to distribute, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, possession of firearms in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, and using premises for drug preparation. (Doc. 31.) All of these charges stem from drugs, drug preparation materials, and firearms obtained from 2504 Kipling Avenue in Cincinnati, Ohio. Torbert contends that the search warrant authorizing the search of the Kipling Avenue address lacked probable cause so the fruits of that search must be suppressed. For the reasons that follow, Defendant's motions will be DENIED .
In January 2018, state and federal drug task force officers began investigating Oscar Torbert for alleged narcotics sales. On March 13, 2019, officers executed a search warrant at Torbert's residence, 2504 Kipling Avenue. The pending motions seek to suppress the evidence discovered in executing the search warrant.
The affidavit underlying the search warrant states:
(Affidavit, Doc. 42-1 at PageID 145.)
Based on the affidavit, a Hamilton County Municipal Judge authorized the search of Torbert's residence—2504 Kipling Avenue, Apartment 2—as well as locked and unlocked storage areas in the building and detached garage. The search of Torbert's apartment yielded drug ledgers, drug preparation materials (including gloves, a blender, scales, a vacuum sealer and bags), a gram of fentanyl, marijuana and multiple cell phones. Officers used a key from Torbert's key chain to unlock a closet numbered "1" in a basement storage area. Inside the locked storage closet, officers found three firearms (two of which were loaded) and presses containing suspected fentanyl residue. Officers also located nearly 1,000 grams of fentanyl behind a stove in the basement common area.
Torbert previously moved for a Franks hearing alleging that officers intentionally omitted material information from the search warrant affidavit to give a false impression that the fentanyl Torbert possessed at the traffic stop originated from his Kipling Avenue residence. Specifically, Torbert stated that after he left his apartment in the silver Accord but before the traffic stop discussed in the affidavit, he stopped at a building on Glen Este Place. Torbert offered affidavits from two others corroborating that the intervening stop occurred. Over the United States’ objection, the Court granted Torbert's request for a Franks1 hearing.
At the Franks hearing, Christopher Smith testified that he drove the silver Accord on the day in question. He confirmed that he, Torbert, and one other person drove together from Kipling Avenue to Glen Este Place. He and the other person waited in the car while Torbert entered the Glen Este Place apartment building for approximately 20 minutes. Once Torbert returned to the car, they drove up Glen Este Place, turned onto Vine Street, and were almost immediately stopped by police.
Similarly, Gregory Sandford testified that he lives on Glen Este Place, and Torbert stopped at his residence during the afternoon of March 13, 2019. He believed that Torbert stayed approximately 20 to 30 minutes. However, both Smith and Sandford noted the length of time that had passed between the March 13, 2019 visit and their February 1, 2021 testimony. Both further testified that they were estimating the length of the visit.
Drug Enforcement Agency ("DEA") Special Agent Tyler Field testified that he participated in the investigation of Defendant Oscar Torbert along with another DEA agent and District Four Cincinnati Police Department ("CPD") officers. He testified that he observed Torbert's activities outside the Kipling Avenue apartment from a pole camera installed on January 22, 2019 across the street from Torbert's residence. The pole camera had swivel and zoom capabilities, and the zoom feature enabled those monitoring the camera feed to identify faces and license plates. Although the live camera feed was not monitored 24 hours a day, the pole camera recorded constantly, and Field routinely monitored the live feed from his computer while he engaged in other tasks. Field further testified that officers observed Torbert meet briefly in or near cars in front of the Kipling Avenue address two additional times, but the affidavit did not include those two additional meetings.
Regarding other investigatory efforts to link Torbert's residence with drug activity, Field testified that CPD officers made a controlled buy from Torbert in 2018 and conducted a trash pull at Kipling Avenue in early 2019. However, the trash pull did not yield evidence of drug-related activity. Field further testified that the search warrant affidavit referred to only one CI in this investigation, but there were many others involved.
Unbeknownst to Torbert, task force officers employed Global Positioning System ("GPS") monitoring on his cell phone. Field testified that every 15 minutes he received a "ping" providing geo-location information for Torbert's cell phone (and presumably Torbert). No officers conducted live surveillance of Torbert on March 13, 2019. Rather, the GPS monitoring system produced one ping on Ronald Reagan Highway, one ping on Glen Este Place, and then pinged on Vine Street, the site of the traffic stop. Thus, Field did not know Torbert had stopped on Glen Este Place.
Finally, CPD Sergeant Scott Brians testified that he was a detective in the Violent Crime Squad during the investigation in question. According to Brians, he and other officers routinely monitor high crime areas looking for vehicles with heavily tinted windows that travel in specific alleys and streets known for drug trafficking. If they observe a potential traffic violation or illegal level of window tint, officers request a traffic stop.
On March 13, 2019, Brians requested a stop of the silver Accord, not knowing that Torbert—the subject of an ongoing drug trafficking...
To continue reading
Request your trial