United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Ass'n
Decision Date | 02 October 1893 |
Docket Number | 236. |
Citation | 58 F. 58 |
Parties | UNITED STATES v. TRANS-MISSOURI FREIGHT ASSOCIATION et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court dismissing a bill brought by the United States against the Trans-Missouri Freight Association and 18 railroad companies, under the provisions of the act of congress of July 2, 1890, entitled 'An act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies,' commonly known as the 'Sherman Anti-Trust Act,' (26 Stat. 209, c. 647; Rev St. Supp. 762,) to dissolve the association, and enjoin the railroad companies from fulfilling an agreement with each other to have and maintain joint rules, regulations, and rates for carrying freight between competing points upon their several roads. The case was heard on the bill and the answers of the several defendants.
The bill alleges that the defendant railroad companies were corporations and common carriers, and that they owned independent and competing lines of railroad in that part of the United States west of the Mississippi and Missouri rivers; that they were engaged in transporting freight among the states and to and from foreign nations, and that they had been encouraged to construct and maintain these competing lines of railroad independent of each other by subsidies and grants of lands from the United States and the people of the states and territories west of these great rivers. The bill then alleges that, not being content with the rates of freight they were receiving, intending oppressively to augment those rates, to counteract the effect of free competition upon them, to establish and maintain arbitrary rates, and to procure large sums of money from the people of those states and territories engaged in interstate commerce they entered into an agreement on March 15, 1889, which, as subsequently modified, reads thus:
the Gulf of Mexico, and thence via said Gulf to the point of beginning, including business between points on the boundary line as described.
'2. All freight traffic originating within the territory as defined in the first section when destined to points east of the aforesaid Missouri river line.
'Exceptions.
'(a) The D. & R. G. and the D. & R. G. W., except their business to and from points in Colorado west of the D. & R. G. line between Denver and Trinidad; also business via their lines between points in Colorado and points in Utah.
'All local business between Denver and Trinidad and intermediate points; all local business of the A., T. & S. F. between Pueblo and Canon City, Colo.; all stone traffic having both origin and destination within the state of Colorado.
'The jurisdiction of this association, in so far as the business of the Denver & Rio Grande and the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railway Companies is concerned, covers the following traffic, namely:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Aluminum Co. of America
...debates which accompanied the passage of the Act. In Re Greene, C.C. Ohio, 52 F. 104, 116, 117; United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association, 8 Cir., 58 F. 58, 82, 24 L.R.A. 73. This notion has usually been expressed by saying that size does not determine guilt; that there must be so......
-
Tidewater Oil Co v. United States
...C.C., 60 F. 306; 60 F. 934; 156 U.S. 1, 15 S.Ct. 249, 39 L.Ed. 325; United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association, C.C., 53 F. 440; 58 F. 58; 166 U.S. 290, 17 S.Ct. 540, 41 L.Ed. 1007. Moreover, there might be an appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals from a decree granting or denying......
-
Cherichel v. Holder
...that they are used in that sense in a subsequent statute, unless the contrary clearly appears.'" (quoting United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Ass'n, 58 F. 58, 67 (8th Cir.1893))). We believe the same principle applies when interpreting regulations that incorporate the understandings of ......
-
Eckerle v. Ferris
... ... [51 P.2d 772] ... those states following the strict construction rule in ... special ... the payment of freight for transportation of rock and sand ... which is available ... throughout ... [51 P.2d 779] ... the United States at a price not in excess of $3.25 per ton ... ...
-
Cooperative Standard Setting
...hostile toward private standard setting.”). 33. 166 U.S. 290 (1897). 34. Id. at 341. 35. See Trans-Missouri Freight Ass’n v. United States, 58 F. 58, 79-80 (8th Cir. 1893). 36. See, e.g. , Catalano, Inc. v. Target Sales, 446 U.S. 643 (1980) (condemning an agreement that standardized credit ......
-
Table Of Cases
...& Nashville R.R. Co., 581 F. Supp. 759 (E.D. Ky. 1983) ..................................142 Trans-Missouri Freight Ass’n v. United States, 58 F. 58 (8th Cir. 1893) ..................................................................................31 Tri-State Rubbish v. Waste Mgmt., 998 F.2......
-
Recovering the Moral Economy Foundations of the Sherman Act.
...omitted)). This debate was significant early in the development of antitrust law, with United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Ass'n, 58 F. 58, 82-83 (8th Cir. 1893), rev'd, 166 U.S. 290 (1897), and United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co., 85 F. 271, 299-300 (6th Cir. 1898), coming t......