United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Ass'n

Decision Date02 October 1893
Docket Number236.
Citation58 F. 58
PartiesUNITED STATES v. TRANS-MISSOURI FREIGHT ASSOCIATION et al.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court dismissing a bill brought by the United States against the Trans-Missouri Freight Association and 18 railroad companies, under the provisions of the act of congress of July 2, 1890, entitled 'An act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies,' commonly known as the 'Sherman Anti-Trust Act,' (26 Stat. 209, c. 647; Rev St. Supp. 762,) to dissolve the association, and enjoin the railroad companies from fulfilling an agreement with each other to have and maintain joint rules, regulations, and rates for carrying freight between competing points upon their several roads. The case was heard on the bill and the answers of the several defendants.

The bill alleges that the defendant railroad companies were corporations and common carriers, and that they owned independent and competing lines of railroad in that part of the United States west of the Mississippi and Missouri rivers; that they were engaged in transporting freight among the states and to and from foreign nations, and that they had been encouraged to construct and maintain these competing lines of railroad independent of each other by subsidies and grants of lands from the United States and the people of the states and territories west of these great rivers. The bill then alleges that, not being content with the rates of freight they were receiving, intending oppressively to augment those rates, to counteract the effect of free competition upon them, to establish and maintain arbitrary rates, and to procure large sums of money from the people of those states and territories engaged in interstate commerce they entered into an agreement on March 15, 1889, which, as subsequently modified, reads thus:

'Memorandum of agreement, made and entered into this fifteenth day of March, 1889, by and between the following railroad companies, viz.: Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad, Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway, Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway, Burlington & Missouri River Railroad in Nebraska, Denver & Rio Grande Railroad, Denver & Rio Grande Western Railway, Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad, Kansas City, Ft. Scott & Memphis Railroad, Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad, Missouri Pacific Railway, Sioux City & Pacific Railroad, St. Joseph & Grand Island Railroad, St. Louis & San Francisco Railway, Union Pacific Railway, Utah Central Railway, and such other companies as may hereafter become parties hereto. Witnesseth, for the purpose of mutual protection, by establishing and maintaining reasonable rates, rules, and regulations on all freight traffic, both through and local, the subscribers do hereby form an association, to be known as the Trans-Missouri Freight Association, and agree to be governed by the following provisions:
'Article I.
'The traffic to be included in the Trans-Missouri Freight Association shall be as follows:
'1. All traffic competitive between any two or more members hereof passing between points in the following described territory, commencing at the Gulf of Mexico, on the 95th meridian; thence north to the Red river; thence via that river to the eastern boundary line of the Indian territory; thence north by said boundary line and the eastern line of the state of Kansas to the Missouri river, at Kansas City; thence via the said Missouri river to the point of intersection of that river with the eastern boundary of Montana; thence via the said eastern boundary line to the international line,--the foregoing to be known as the 'Missouri River line;' thence via said international line to the Pacific coast; thence via the Pacific coast to the international line between the United States and Mexico; thence via said international line to

the Gulf of Mexico, and thence via said Gulf to the point of beginning, including business between points on the boundary line as described.

'2. All freight traffic originating within the territory as defined in the first section when destined to points east of the aforesaid Missouri river line.

'Exceptions.

'(a) The D. & R. G. and the D. & R. G. W., except their business to and from points in Colorado west of the D. & R. G. line between Denver and Trinidad; also business via their lines between points in Colorado and points in Utah.

'All local business between Denver and Trinidad and intermediate points; all local business of the A., T. & S. F. between Pueblo and Canon City, Colo.; all stone traffic having both origin and destination within the state of Colorado.

'The jurisdiction of this association, in so far as the business of the Denver & Rio Grande and the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railway Companies is concerned, covers the following traffic, namely:

'All freight traffic to, from, or through all common or junction points in the states of Nebraska and Kansas and the Indian Territory, originating at or destined to Denver, Colorado Springs, Pueblo, or Trinidad.
'All freight traffic between Ogden, Spanish Fork, and intermediate points on the one hand, and to, from, or through points in Kansas or Nebraska upon or east of the 103d meridian, on the other hand.
'Traffic which may be excluded under the application of the above is only such as may be delivered to or received from the Denver & Rio Grande Railroad and Denver and Rio Grande Western Railway.
'(b) Traffic included in the Trans-Continental and International Association.
'(c) Traffic passing between points in Kansas or Nebraska and Mississippi river points, Carondelet and south; also traffic passing between points in Kansas or Nebraska and points in the southern states east of the Mississippi river and south of the south line of Kentucky and Virginia, regardless of the route by which the business crosses the Mississippi or Ohio rivers.
'(d) Traffic passing between Missouri river points and points in the territory east of said river.
'(e) All traffic to points on the Northern Pacific and Manitoba Railways.
'(f) Traffic to points in Arkansas.
'(g) Coal, stone, and gravel from Colorado, Wyoming, and Dakota, to points in Kansas and Nebraska, and to Sioux City, Council Bluffs, or Pacific Junction, Iowa, St. Joseph, Kansas City, or Boswell, Mo.
'(h) The interchange of traffic with the Colorado Midland and South Park Companies, to or from Aspen, Colorado, Glenwood Springs, Colorado, and intermediate points, including coal branches therefrom, and Buena Vista, Colorado, and Leadville, Colorado.
'(i) Business to and from Florence, Colorado, by all lines.
'Article II.
'Section 1. The association shall, by unanimous vote, elect a chairman of the organization. The chairman may be removed by a two-thirds vote of the members.
'Sec. 2. There shall be regular meetings of the association at Kansas City, unless notice shall be given by the chairman that the business to be transacted does not warrant calling the members together, which notice shall be given not less than four days before the day set for the meeting. When a meeting, regular or special, is convened, it shall be incumbent upon each party hereto to be represented by some officer authorized to act definitely upon any and all questions to be considered. Each road shall designate to the chairman one person who shall be held personally responsible for rates on that road. Such person shall be present at all regular meetings when possible, and shall represent his road, unless a superior officer is present. If unable to attend, he shall send a substitute, with written authority to act upon all questions which may arise, and the vote of such substitute shall be binding upon the company he represents.
'Sec. 3. A committee shall be appointed to establish rates, rules, and regulations on the traffic subject to this association, and to consider changes therein, and make rules for meeting the competition of outside lines. Their conclusions, when unanimous, shall be made effective when they so order; but if they differ the question at issue shall be referred to the managers of the lines parties hereto, and if they disagree it shall be arbitrated in the manner provided in article 7.
'Sec. 4. At least five days' written notice prior to each monthly meeting shall be given the chairman of any proposed reduction in rates, or change in any rule or regulation governing freight traffic; eight days in so far as applicable to the traffic of Colorado or Utah.
'Sec. 5. At each monthly meeting the association shall consider and vote upon all changes proposed of which due notice has been given, and all parties shall be bound by the decision of the association so expressed, unless then and there the parties shall give the association definite written notice that in ten days thereafter they shall make such modification, notwithstanding the vote of the association: provided, that, if the member giving notice of the change shall fail to be represented at the meeting, no action shall be taken on its notice, and the same shall be considered withdrawn. Should any member insist upon a reduction of rate against the views of the majority, or if the majority favor the same, and if, in the judgment of said majority, the rate so made affects seriously the rates upon other traffic, then the association may, by a majority vote upon such other traffic, put into effect corresponding rates, to take effect upon the same day. By unanimous consent any rate, rule, or regulation relating to freight traffic may be modified at any meeting of the association without previous notice.
'Sec. 6. Notwithstanding
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
40 cases
  • United States v. Aluminum Co. of America
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • March 12, 1945
    ...debates which accompanied the passage of the Act. In Re Greene, C.C. Ohio, 52 F. 104, 116, 117; United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association, 8 Cir., 58 F. 58, 82, 24 L.R.A. 73. This notion has usually been expressed by saying that size does not determine guilt; that there must be so......
  • Tidewater Oil Co v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • December 6, 1972
    ...C.C., 60 F. 306; 60 F. 934; 156 U.S. 1, 15 S.Ct. 249, 39 L.Ed. 325; United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association, C.C., 53 F. 440; 58 F. 58; 166 U.S. 290, 17 S.Ct. 540, 41 L.Ed. 1007. Moreover, there might be an appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals from a decree granting or denying......
  • Cherichel v. Holder
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • January 12, 2010
    ...that they are used in that sense in a subsequent statute, unless the contrary clearly appears.'" (quoting United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Ass'n, 58 F. 58, 67 (8th Cir.1893))). We believe the same principle applies when interpreting regulations that incorporate the understandings of ......
  • Eckerle v. Ferris
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • October 29, 1935
    ... ... [51 P.2d 772] ... those states following the strict construction rule in ... special ... the payment of freight for transportation of rock and sand ... which is available ... throughout ... [51 P.2d 779] ... the United States at a price not in excess of $3.25 per ton ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Cooperative Standard Setting
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Handbook on the Antitrust Aspects of Standard Setting
    • January 1, 2011
    ...hostile toward private standard setting.”). 33. 166 U.S. 290 (1897). 34. Id. at 341. 35. See Trans-Missouri Freight Ass’n v. United States, 58 F. 58, 79-80 (8th Cir. 1893). 36. See, e.g. , Catalano, Inc. v. Target Sales, 446 U.S. 643 (1980) (condemning an agreement that standardized credit ......
  • Table Of Cases
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Handbook on the Antitrust Aspects of Standard Setting
    • January 1, 2011
    ...& Nashville R.R. Co., 581 F. Supp. 759 (E.D. Ky. 1983) ..................................142 Trans-Missouri Freight Ass’n v. United States, 58 F. 58 (8th Cir. 1893) ..................................................................................31 Tri-State Rubbish v. Waste Mgmt., 998 F.2......
  • Recovering the Moral Economy Foundations of the Sherman Act.
    • United States
    • Yale Law Journal Vol. 131 No. 1, October 2021
    • October 1, 2021
    ...omitted)). This debate was significant early in the development of antitrust law, with United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Ass'n, 58 F. 58, 82-83 (8th Cir. 1893), rev'd, 166 U.S. 290 (1897), and United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co., 85 F. 271, 299-300 (6th Cir. 1898), coming t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT