United States v. Twelve Miscellaneous Firearms
Decision Date | 27 January 1993 |
Docket Number | 92-1476.,No. 92-1475,92-1475 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. TWELVE MISCELLANEOUS FIREARMS and Three Firearm Receivers, Defendants, and UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. FOURTEEN MISCELLANEOUS FIREARMS and Seven Firearm Receivers, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Central District of Illinois |
Esteban F. Sanchez, U.S. Attorney's Office, Springfield, IL, for plaintiff.
Rex L. Reu, Bloomington, IL, Thomas Schanzle-Haskins, Giffin Winning Cohen & Bodewes, Springfield, IL, for defendants.
Before the Court is Claimant F.J. Vollmer & Company, Inc. and Claimant Kenneth L. Nevius' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaints filed in the above captioned cases.
To sustain a dismissal of a complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), the Court must take all well-pleaded complaints as true and construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff to determine whether Plaintiff is entitled to relief. Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 101-102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). "The issue is not whether Plaintiff will prevail but whether the Plaintiff is entitled to offer evidence to support the claim." Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1686, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974).
In this action, Plaintiff seeks to forfeit to the United States certain weapons which were in Claimants' possession. Claimants possessed the weapons in violation of federal law, and the weapons were seized pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d)(1). Claimants argue that the seizure took place in September of 1991 but that the Complaint was not filed until October of 1992, over one year later. The time limit for the commencement of "any action or proceeding for the forfeiture of firearms ... shall be within one hundred and twenty days of seizure." Id. Because the Complaint was filed more than 120 days after seizure, Claimants argue that the action must be dismissed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d)(1).
The Court finds, however, that the phrase "any action or proceeding," as stated in § 924(d)(1), does not refer simply to court actions, as Claimants argue. Rather, the phrase also contemplates administrative actions. Clearly the phrase "any action or proceeding" could not be read so narrowly as to preclude administrative proceedings. More importantly, however, § 924(d)(1) is governed by "all provisions of the Internal Revenue Code ... relating to seizure, forfeiture, and disposition of firearms...." Id. The Internal Revenue Code mandates administrative proceedings "in all cases of seizures of any goods ... subject to forfeiture ... which ... are of the appraised value of $100,000.00 or less...." 26 U.S.C. § 7325. See also Cooper v. City of Greenwood, Mississippi, 904 F.2d 302, 305-306 (5th Cir.1990) ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. v. Ninety Three Firearms
...administrative and the judicial forfeiture actions were not commenced within the 120-day timeframe); United States v. Twelve Miscellaneous Firearms, 816 F.Supp. 1316, 1317 (C.D.Ill.1993) (deciding that although the phrase "any action or proceeding" includes both judicial and administrative ......
-
U.S. v. Twelve Firearms, Civ.A. H-97-295.
...and twenty days of such seizure." This provision has been interpreted in only two reported cases. In United States v. Twelve Miscellaneous Firearms, 816 F.Supp. 1316, 1317 (C.D.Ill. 1993), one district court ruled that the phrase "any action or proceeding" in § 924(d)(1) includes administra......
-
U.S. v. Sixty Firearms, 3:CV-00-1470.
...four decisions will be reviewed in the chronological order in which they were decided. The first case is United States v. Twelve Miscellaneous Firearms, 816 F.Supp. 1316 (C.D.Ill.1993). In that case, the seizure occurred in September of 1991 and an action was not filed in court until Octobe......
-
U.S. v. Miscellaneous Firearms, Explosives, 00-3035.
...interpreted in only three reported cases, one of which originated in this district. Specifically, in United States v. Twelve Miscellaneous Firearms, 816 F.Supp. 1316 (C.D.Ill.1993), Judge McDade concluded that the phrase "[a]ny action or proceeding" in § 924(d)(1) did not refer solely to co......