United States v. Tyson's Poultry, Inc., 483
Decision Date | 09 April 1963 |
Docket Number | No. 483,484.,483 |
Citation | 216 F. Supp. 53 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner, v. TYSON'S POULTRY, INC., Respondent. UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner, v. PLUS POULTRY, INC., Respondent. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Arkansas |
Charles M. Conway, U. S. Atty., E. A. Riddle, Asst. U. S. Atty., Fort Smith, Ark., for petitioner.
Russell Elrod, Siloam Springs, Ark., Hall & Sublett, Tulsa, Okl., for Plus Poultry.
Crouch, Blair & Cypert, Springdale, Ark., for Tyson's Poultry, Inc.
A. E. Townsend, Jr., Little Rock, Ark., amicus curiae.
The petitioner seeks enforcement of subpoenas duces tecum against the respondents as live poultry dealers and handlers under the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended, 7 U.S.C. § 181 et seq. Section 218b of Title 7 U.S.C., defines the term "live poultry dealer" as: "Any person engaged in the business of buying or selling live poultry in commerce for purposes of slaughter either on his own account or as the employee or agent of the vendor or purchaser."
Section 182(6) provides:
"The term `commerce' means commerce between any State, Territory, or possession, or the District of Columbia, and any place outside thereof; or between points within the same State, Territory, or possession, or the District of Columbia, but through any place outside thereof; or within any Territory or possession, or the District of Columbia."
Section 183 of the same Title provides:
Section 192 of the same Title enumerates the following unlawful practices pertaining to live poultry dealers or handlers:
Section 222 of Title 7 U.S.C., makes the provisions of Sections 46 and 48-50 of Title 15 U.S.C., applicable to the jurisdiction, powers and duties of the Secretary in enforcing the provisions of the Packers and Stockyards Act, and further provides:
"The Secretary, in person or by such agents as he may designate, may prosecute any inquiry necessary to his duties under this chapter in any part of the United States."
Section 46(a), Title 15 U.S.C., provides:
Section 49 of the same Title provides in part:
In August, 1962, the Director of the Packers and Stockyards Division of the Agricultural Marketing Service of the United States Department of Agriculture, pursuant to authority delegated to him from the Secretary of Agriculture, caused preliminary investigations to be made, under the Act, of the poultry industry in Arkansas and of each respondent. Upon the basis of the information obtained in connection with such preliminary investigations, the Director determined that a more thorough investigation should be made of the poultry industry in Arkansas, and of the nature of the organization of each respondent, the acquisition and slaughtering of live poultry and the processing and sale of poultry and poultry products, to determine whether the operations of respondents, during the first nine months of 1962, were in compliance with the Act. In connection with such investigations, employees of the Packers and Stockyards Division requested each respondent to make certain records, relevant to those matters, available to them for examination, but respondents refused to make available the records requested. Thereupon, subpoenas duces tecum issued by the Director, pursuant to authority delegated to him under the Act from the Secretary of Agriculture, were duly served upon respondents, which stated:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. v. Hill
...denied sub nom. Meyer Zausner Sales, Inc. v. Freeman, 384 U.S. 933, 86 S.Ct. 1446, 16 L.Ed.2d 532 (1966); United States v. Tyson's Poultry, Inc., 216 F.Supp. 53, 56 (W.D.Ark.), appeal dismissed, 319 F.2d 860 (8th Cir.1963) (per curiam); Fleming v. Cudahy Packing Co., 41 F.Supp. 910, 914 (S.......
-
U.S. v. Perdue Farms, Inc., 687
...court enforcement of USDA subpoenas, United States v. Marshall Durbin & Co., 363 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1966); United States v. Tyson's Poultry, Inc., 216 F.Supp. 53 (W.D.Ark.), appeal dismissed, 319 F.2d 860 (8th Cir. 1963). While this history of administrative actions directed at the slaughtere......
-
U.S. v. Lehman
...1405 (7th Cir.1973) (" 'pertaining to the purchase and sale of livestock, meat, and meat food products' "); United States v. Tyson's Poultry, Inc., 216 F.Supp. 53 (W.D.Ark.1963) (" 'in connection with the acquisition of live poultry or poultry products' "); cf. C.P. McGloshen v. United Stat......
-
United States v. Marshall Durbin & Co. of Haleyville, Inc.
...may be obtained. United States v. Morton Salt Co., 338 U.S. 632, 640, 70 S.Ct. 357, 94 L.Ed. 401 (1950); United States v. Tyson's Poultry Co., 216 F.Supp. 53, 63 (W.D.Ark.1963). Appellees cannot be serious in urging that their activities do not meet the jurisdictional requirements of inters......