United States v. Utah Construction and Mining Co
| Decision Date | 08 November 1965 |
| Docket Number | No. 440,440 |
| Citation | United States v. Utah Construction and Mining Co, 382 U.S. 900, 86 S.Ct. 234, 15 L.Ed.2d 155 (1965) |
| Parties | UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and David L. Rose, for the United States.
Gardiner Johnson and Thomas E. Stanton, Jr., for respondent.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Claims granted.Case placed on the summary calendar and set for oral argument immediately following No. 439.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
87 cases
-
United States v. Bally Manufacturing Corporation
... ... , the following quotation is taken as a fair and accurate statement of statutory construction with regard to 18 U.S.C. § 1952: ... "To combat wide and nefarious interstate racketeering the ... ...
-
United States v. Garrison
... ... " Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391, 46 S.Ct. 126, 127, 70 L.Ed. 322 (1926). Accord, Riehl, supra, 460 F.2d ... ...
-
People v. Brawley
... ... were confined in the disciplinary barracks of the United States Naval Station in San Diego immediately before the ... ...
- United States v. Alexander, 19757.
Get Started for Free