United States v. Vargas, 24938.
| Decision Date | 05 January 1971 |
| Docket Number | No. 24938.,24938. |
| Citation | 436 F.2d 1280 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Jose VARGAS, Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Richard C. Turrone (argued), San Jose, Cal., for appellant.
Robert P. Scheinblum (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Crim. Div., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff and appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and CONTI, District Judge.
The judgment of conviction in their heroin case is affirmed.
The one serious point is the significance of 18 U.S.C. § 3109 on the facts here. Federal agents entered the apartment of Vargas through an open door, announcing an arrest of an associate (who later pleaded guilty). After entry a search followed the arrest, which uncovered heroin.
In our view, the thrust of Section 3109 () is aimed at the closed or locked door. Here we think the advance announcement of the officers' identity and statement of purpose was sufficient. A significant factor here was the immediate presence of Vargas and his friend (about to be arrested) right inside the door. It was not a case of officers sneaking in and going prowling.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Harada
...1361, 1365 (9th Cir.1979) ("entry through an open door is not a `breaking' within the meaning of the statute"); United States v. Vargas, 436 F.2d 1280, 1281 (9th Cir.1971) ("thrust of Section 3109 ... is aimed at the closed or locked door"). Moreover, the district court correctly noted that......
-
U.S. v. Mendoza
...motel room after probable cause was established and as defendants opened the door to leave, did not require knocking) United States v. Vargas, 436 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir.1971) ("the thrust of § 3109 ... is aimed at the closed or locked door."); United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730 (10th Cir.1......
-
United States v. Bustamante-Gamez
...S.Ct. 1623 (opinion of Brennan, J.), we held that the officers were justified in entering at that point. Similarly, in United States v. Vargas, 9 Cir., 1971, 436 F.2d 1280, we upheld an entry through an open door when the announcement was made simultaneously with or just prior to entry. We ......
-
Chonich v. Wayne County Community College
... ... Nos. 87-1595, 87-1632 ... United States Court of Appeals, ... Sixth Circuit ... Argued July 22, 1988 ... ...