United States v. Wagner, 8476.

Citation93 F.2d 77
Decision Date22 December 1937
Docket NumberNo. 8476.,8476.
PartiesUNITED STATES v. WAGNER.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key, Paul R. Russell, J. Leonard Lyons, and M. S. Zimmerman, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and Peirson M. Hall, U. S. Atty., and E. H. Mitchell and Alva C. Baird, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for the United States.

Claude I. Parker, John B. Milliken, J. Everett Blum, and Mills, Hunter & Dunn, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

This was an action by appellant on a bond executed by appellee Alma I. Wagner, executrix of the last will of Robert G. Wagner, deceased, as principal, and appellee United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, as surety. Appellant prayed judgment for $19,401.64, with interest on $13,380.44 thereof at the rate of 6 per cent. per annum from August 26, 1933, to September 1, 1933, and at the rate of 1 per cent. a month from and after September 1, 1933. Appellees answered, admitting every material fact alleged in the complaint, but denying any liability to appellant. Appellant moved for judgment on the pleadings. The District Court entered judgment in appellant's favor for the principal sum claimed, with interest on $13,380.44 thereof at the rate of 6 per cent. per annum from August 26, 1933, to September 1, 1933; at the rate of 7 per cent. per annum from September 1, 1933, to August 30, 1935, and at the rate of 6 per cent. per annum from and after August 30, 1935. This appeal followed.

Facts alleged by appellant and admitted by appellees are as follows:

Robert G. Wagner died on May 25, 1927. Letters testamentary were issued to appellee Alma I. Wagner on June 15, 1927. On October 19, 1927, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined that there was a deficiency of $13,380.44 in respect of said decedent's income tax for 1920, and so notified the executrix. The executrix thereupon petitioned the Board of Tax Appeals for a redetermination of the alleged deficiency. On June 29, 1931, the Board rendered its decision, sustaining the Commissioner's determination. On October 24, 1931, the bond in suit was executed by appellees and filed with the Board. The surety (United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company) was approved by the Board on December 15, 1931. The bond reads as follows:

"United States Board of Tax Appeals, Washington, D. C. Alma I. Wagner, executrix, of the estate of Robert G. Wagner, deceased, appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, appellee. Docket No. 32981. Bond.

"Know all men by these presents, that we, Alma I. Wagner, executrix * * *, as principal, and the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, * * * as surety, are held and firmly bound unto * * * the United States of America, in the sum of twenty-six thousand seven hundred sixty and 88/100 dollars ($26,760.88) * * *; for the payment of which well and truly to be made we bind ourselves and each of us and our successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. * * *

"Whereas, the above named Alma I. Wagner, executrix * * *, is filing or is about to file with the U. S. Board of Tax Appeals, a petition for review of the Board's decision in this case by the Circuit Court of Appeals of the United States for the Ninth Circuit. * * *

"Now, therefore, the condition of this obligation is such, that if the above named Alma I. Wagner, executrix * * * shall file her petition for review and shall prosecute said petition for review to effect and shall pay the deficiency as finally determined, together with any interest, additional amounts or additions to the tax provided for by law, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise the same shall be and remain in full force and virtue."

This bond was filed under and pursuant to section 1001(c) of the Revenue Act of 1926, as amended by section 603 of the Revenue Act of 1928, 45 Stat. 873, 26 U.S. C.A. § 644, which provides:

"Notwithstanding any provision of law imposing restrictions on the assessment and collection of deficiencies, such review shall not operate as a stay of assessment or collection of any portion of the amount of the deficiency determined by the Board unless a petition for review in respect of such portion is duly filed by the taxpayer, and then only if the taxpayer (1) on or before the time his petition for review is filed has filed with the Board a bond in a sum fixed by the Board not exceeding double the amount of the portion of the deficiency in respect of which the petition for review is filed, and with surety approved by the Board, conditioned upon the payment of the deficiency as finally determined, together with any interest, additional amounts, or additions to the tax provided for by law * * *."

The...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar Company
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Colorado
    • May 6, 1975
    ...Young v. Godbe, 82 U.S. 562, 15 Wall. 562, 565, 21 L.Ed. 250; Maryland Casualty Co. v. United States, 5 Cir., 76 F.2d 626; United States v. Wagner, 9 Cir., 93 F.2d 77; United States v. Hamilton, 7 Cir., 96 F.2d 878; Massachusetts Bonding and Ins. Co. v. United States, 9 Cir., 97 F.2d 879, 8......
  • United States v. Sterling Islands, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • May 20, 2019
    ...ex rel. McKittrick v. Missouri Public Service Commission, 352 Mo. 29, 175 S.W.2d 857, 861 ; United States law, U.S. v. Wagner, C.C.A. Cal., 93 F.2d 77, 79 ; War Department regulations, Standard Oil Co. of California v. Johnson, Cal., 316 U.S. 481, 62 S.Ct. 1168, 1169, 86 L.Ed. 1611.A concur......
  • Royal Indemnity Co v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • May 26, 1941
    ...L.Ed. 696; Young v. Godbe, 15 Wall. 562, 565, 21 L.Ed. 250; Maryland Casualty Co. v. United States, 5 Cir., 76 F.2d 626; United States v. Wagner, 9 Cir., 93 F.2d 77; United States v. Hamilton, 7 Cir., 96 F.2d 878, 117 A.L.R. 446; Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. United States, 9 Cir., 97......
  • Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • June 29, 1938
    ...this rule is cited by the government. Our attention is called to United States v. Rigali, 9 Cir., 90 F.2d 929, 931, and United States v. Wagner, 9 Cir., 93 F.2d 77, 78, in each of which a tax deficiency bond similar to the one before us was involved. In each case it was held that the surety......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT