United States v. Walker, 6147.
| Decision Date | 15 August 1972 |
| Docket Number | No. 6147.,6147. |
| Citation | 294 A.2d 376 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. William A. WALKER, Appellee. |
| Court | D.C. Court of Appeals |
James F. McMullin, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Thomas A. Flannery, U. S. Atty., John A. Terry and William M. Brodsky, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellant.
Lawrence H. Schwartz, Washington, D. C., appointed by this court, with whom James S. Dawson, III, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.
Before KELLY and NEBEKER, Associate Judges, and HOOD, Chief Judge, Retired.
Holding that a pistol was the product of an illegal search and seizure, the trial court granted a pretrial motion to suppress. The Government has appealed.1
The evidence was that two uniformed police officers, sitting in a police car on a public street, were approached by a man about 35 years of age accompanied by a 9-year-old boy. This man told the officers there was a man named Willie sitting on the porch of a house in the 1400 block of Swann Street with a gun in his waistband. He described the man as wearing a black shirt and blue knit hat and having an artificial leg. The informant was unknown to the officers and refused to give his name, saying he "was afraid to be involved."
The officers drove to the 1400 block of Swann Street (a distance of about two blocks from where they received the information) and observed four men on the porch of 1420 Swann Street, an abandoned house. One of the group was wearing a blue knit hat and black shirt and appeared to be sleeping. The officers approached the group and one officer felt the legs of the sleeping man and determined the right leg was artificial. No weapon was then visible. The officer said "Willie, stand up, turn around, place your hands on the porch". The man complied and the officer ran his hand around the man's waistband and removed a loaded pistol from the right front waistband. The man (appellee) was arrested and charged with carrying a pistol without a license.2
In granting the motion to suppress the trial court laid stress on the fact that the officers acted on information given by a person who was unknown to them and whose name they did not obtain. Reference was made to our decision in United States v. Frye, D.C.App., 271 A.2d 788, 791 (1970), where we urged that police "where it is at all practicable" secure the name and address of "a citizen giving information on the street," and thus "go far to remove from subsequent prosecutions the troublesome factors of the unknown and unidentified and uncorroborated informant." However we did not hold that police should ignore information from an unknown and unidentified citizen. Here the officers attempted to obtain the citizen's, name. When he refused to give his name the officers were not required to drop the matter then and there; they were under a duty to investigate it.
When the officers went to 1420 Swann Street and saw a man dressed as described by the citizen they had a right to make an investigatory stop. When preliminary investigation revealed that the man had an artificial leg, the officers had a right to seek further information by questioning the man. Before questioning him they had the right under Terry v. Ohio, 392...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State in Interest of H.B.
...of allegedly armed bus passenger based on anonymous message thrown into highway toll booth held proper); United States v. Walker, 294 A.2d 376 (D.C.App.1972), cert. den. 414 U.S. 1007, 94 S.Ct. 368, 38 L.Ed.2d 245 (1973) (stop and risk based on anonymous tip upheld; police have duty to inve......
-
Henighan v. United States, 80-169.
...about possession or transfer of such contraband. Such corroboration of citizen-supplied tips has not been required. United States v. Walker, D.C.App., 294 A.2d 376 (1972), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1007, 94 S.Ct. 368, 38 L.Ed.2d 245 (1973). We deem controlling the Supreme Court's analysis in a......
-
District of Columbia v. M. E. H.
...were commenced. Controlling in this area of Fourth Amendment considerations are the decisions of this court in United States v. Walker, D.C.App., 294 A.2d 376 (1972);8 United States v. Frye, D.C.App., 271 A.2d 788 (1970); and Allen v. United States, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 61, 390 F.2d 476 Almost ......
-
Johnson v. State
...People v. Tooks, 403 Mich. 568, 271 N.W.2d 503 (1978); People v. Lopez, 52 Cal.App.3d 263, 123 Cal.Rptr. 855 (1975); United States v. Walker, 294 A.2d 376 (D.C.App.1972), appeal dismissed 304 A.2d 290 (D.C.App.), cert. den. 414 U.S. 1007, 94 S.Ct. 368, 38 L.Ed.2d 245 (1973); State v. Bolden......