United States v. Wallis
Decision Date | 07 October 1893 |
Docket Number | 27. |
Citation | 58 F. 942 |
Parties | UNITED STATES v. WALLIS. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Idaho |
Fremont Wood, U.S. Atty.
James H. Hawley, for defendant.
The defendant has interposed his demurrer to an indictment based on section 3894, Rev. St., as amended by the act of September 19, 1890, (26 Stat. 465,) wherein is the provision: 'Nor shall any newspaper, circular, pamphlet or publication of any kind, containing any advertisement of any lottery or gift enterprise of any kind, offering prizes, dependent upon lot or chance * * * be carried in the mails.' Also it is further provided that any person who shall knowingly deposit in or send through the mail any such forbidden matter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor. The indictment has two counts, by the first of which it is charged that defendant did knowingly deposit in the United States mail a newspaper called 'The Post,' which contained an advertisement as follows, to wit:
The statute is directed against the use of the mails for the conveyance of any advertisement of 'any lottery or gift enterprise of any kind.' This language is sufficiently comprehensive to include any scheme in the nature of a lottery. It cannot be deemed necessary to here enumerate the many similar definitions given by lexicographers and courts of the term 'lottery.' It may be sufficient to say that it embraces the elements of procuring through lot or chance, by the investment of a sum of money or something of value, some greater amount of money or thing of greater value. When such are the chief...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
At & T Corp. v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe
...that an "activity" material to the Lottery's operation necessarily includes the act of ordering a chance.6 See, e.g., United States v. Wallis, 58 F. 942 (D.Idaho 1893) (explaining that at a minimum, a lottery "embraces the elements of procuring through lot or chance, by the investment of a ......
-
Equitable Loan & Sec. Co. v. Waring
...device for the hazarding of any money or valuable thing."' A number of cases are reviewed by Mr. Justice Cobb in the opinion. In U.S. v. Wallis (D. C.) 58 F. 942, a similar is made, and it is also said that "the word 'lottery' embraces the elements of procuring through lot or chance, by the......
-
Aloe v. Mutual Reserve Life Association
... ... Co., 9 F. 249.] But it is claimed by plaintiff that the ... cases cited from the United States Supreme Court have been ... greatly modified by more recent decisions of that court, and ... ...
-
State v. McEwan
...Crime (2 Ed.), sec. 952; 2 Bouvier's Law Dictionary, Rawle's Revision; 38 C. J., p. 286; Horner v. United States, 147 U.S. 449; United States v. Wallis, 58 F. 942; States v. Purvis, 195 F. 618. (2) Since the defendant is charged with a felony created by the statute, it must be strictly cons......