United States v. Wapnick
| Decision Date | 27 March 1963 |
| Docket Number | No. 242,Docket 27537.,242 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Harold WAPNICK, James LaFazia, Charles Gersh, and David Brill, Defendants-Appellants. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Herbert S. Siegal, New York City, for defendant-appellant Harold Wapnick.
Joseph Brill, New York City, for defendant-appellant James LaFazia.
Jacob W. Friedman, New York City, for defendants-appellants Charles Gersh and David Brill.
Jerome C. Ditore, Asst. U. S. Atty., E.D.N.Y., Brooklyn, N. Y. (Joseph P. Hoey, U. S. Atty., Brooklyn, N. Y., on the brief), for appellee.
Before CLARK and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON, District Judge.
The evidence here was quite sufficient and the case was fairly tried and properly presented to the jury. Hence we find no reversible error. Defendant Wapnick's contention of double jeopardy is prima facie untenable in the light of United States v. Lanza, 260 U.S. 377, 43 S.Ct. 141, 67 L.Ed. 314, and Abbate v. United States, 359 U.S. 187, 79 S.Ct. 666, 3 L.Ed.2d 729.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Moeller
...v. United States, 340 F.2d 837, 839 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 902, 85 S.Ct. 1446, 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965); United States v. Wapnick, 315 F.2d 96 (2d Cir. 1963); Rios v. United States, 256 F.2d 173 (9th Cir. 1958); State v. Smith, 359 So.2d 160, 163 (La.1978); State v. West, 260 N.W.2......
-
United States v. Hutul
...nor in privity with that of the State of Illinois. See United States v. Wapnick, 198 F.Supp. 359 (D.C.E.D. N.Y.1961), aff'd. per curiam, 315 F.2d 96, cert. den. 374 U.S. 829, 83 S.Ct. 1868, 10 L.Ed.2d 1052; Rios v. United States, 256 F.2d 173 (9th Cir. 1958). Therefore, the principles of re......
-
United States v. Feinberg
...e., an identity of successive sovereigns, Abbate v. United States, 359 U.S. 187, 79 S.Ct. 666, 3 L.Ed.2d 729 (1959); United States v. Wapnick, 315 F.2d 96 (2 Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829, 83 S.Ct. 1868, 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1965), and an identity of alleged offenses, 2 Wharton's Crimi......
-
Commonwealth v. Studebaker
...v. United States, 203 F.2d 576, 578 (5th Cir. 1953); United States v. Wapnick, 198 F.Supp. 359, 360 (EDNY 1961), aff'd per curiam, 315 F.2d 96 (2 Cir. 1963), denied, 374 U.S. 829, 83 S.Ct. 1868 (10 L.Ed.2d 1052) (1965); United States v. Kramer, (2 Cir.) supra 289 F.2d (909) at 913. There is......