United States v. Weatherford, 73-1751.

Decision Date20 February 1974
Docket NumberNo. 73-1751.,73-1751.
Citation493 F.2d 248
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Vanessa WEATHERFORD, Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Kent W. Faerber, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

Wesley D. Wedemeyer, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., was present but Court did not require argument for appellee.

Before HEANEY and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and DENNEY, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted of unlawfully having two checks in her possession, knowing that the checks were stolen in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708. She contends on appeal: (1) that the trial court erred in denying her motion for a judgment of acquittal because the evidence did not establish that she knew the checks were stolen, and (2) that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of other crimes. We find no merit to either contention and affirm the trial court.

The evidence was more than sufficient to establish not only that the checks were stolen and were in the possession of the defendant, but that she knew the checks were stolen.

The evidence of other crimes objected to by the defendant, showed that the defendant forged the endorsements upon and uttered each of the two checks involved in the unlawful possession charge. This evidence was clearly admissible because the acts were integral parts of the offense for which the defendant was charged. See, United States v. Cochran, 475 F.2d 1080, 1082-1083 (8th Cir. 1973).

Affirmed.

* DENNEY, District Judge, District of Nebraska, sitting by designation.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • U.S. v. Howard, s. 73-1856
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 29 Octubre 1974
    ...Cochran, 475 F.2d 1080, 1082 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 833, 94 S.Ct. 173, 38 L.Ed.2d 68 (1973). See also United States v. Weatherford, 493 F.2d 248 (8th Cir. 1974). The evidence in question here clearly fits this latter category. The record shows that Howard offered to sell to unde......
  • Bill's Coal Company, Inc. v. NLRB, 73-1528.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • 14 Marzo 1974
    ... ... No. 73-1528 ... United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit ... Argued and Submitted January ... ...
  • U.S. v. Gomez, 79-1626
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • 9 Enero 1981
    ...is admissible evidence as it is an integral part of the underlying offense for which he was charged. See, e. g., United States v. Weatherford, 493 F.2d 248 (8th Cir.) (possession of stolen mail The judge properly instructed the jury as to the caution it should take in assessing an accomplic......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT