United States v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Citation272 F. 893
Decision Date10 March 1921
Docket Number243.
PartiesUNITED STATES v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

Francis G. Caffey, U.S. Atty., of New York City (Earl B. Barnes Asst. U.S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.

Rush Taggart, Joseph P. Cotton, and Francis R. Stark, all of New York City, for appellee.

Before WARD, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The Western Union Telegraph Company, a corporation of the state of New York, entered into a contract with the Western Telegraph Company, Limited, a British corporation, whereby the American company agreed to lay a submarine telegraph cable between the Island of Barbados, West Indies, and a point on Miami Beach, on the east coast of Florida, and the British company agreed to lay a cable from Brazil to Barbados, to be there connected with the cable of the American company. The British company has an interport monopoly of ocean cable communication given it by the government of Brazil, which excludes American companies from operating cables directly from the United States to Brazil. When the Western Union Telegraph Company was about to land the American end of its cable at Miami Beach, the President forbade its doing so, and has actually prevented the landing by means of United States naval vessels. The end of the cable is now buoyed a little more than a marine league from Miami Beach.

Thereupon the Western Union Telegraph Company, which has three cables from Key West, Fla., to Cojimar, Cuba (one laid upon the Ft Taylor military reservation under a permit of the Secretary of War dated January 4, 1917, and the other two laid without permit), proposed to splice one of these cables into its uncompleted cable and to deliver messages from the United States to the British cable company in the West Indies, to be resent to destination, and vice versa to receive from the British company messages for the United States and resend them over its own cable. The President has revoked the permit heretofore granted for one of the cables between Key West and Cojimar and has transmitted a permit to the Western Union Telegraph Company for all three cables, which the Western Union Telegraph Company has refused to accept.

The United States filed a bill in equity in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, asking among other things, for a preliminary injunction to prevent the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Youngstown Sheet Tube Co v. Sawyer Sawyer v. Youngstown Sheet Tube Co
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 2 Junio 1952
    ...see, Jecker v. Montgomery, 13 How. 498, 515, 14 L.Ed. 240; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. United States, D.C., 272 F. 311, affirmed, 2 Cir., 272 F. 893, reversed on consent of the parties, 260 U.S. 754, 43 S.Ct. 91, 67 L.Ed. 497; United States Harness Co. v. Graham, D.C., 288 F. 929. 3. Sin......
  • Chicago Southern Air Lines v. Waterman Corporation Civil Aeronautics Board v. Same
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 9 Febrero 1948
    ...Syndicate Co. v. New York Central R. Co., 275 U.S. 179, 48 S.Ct. 39, 72 L.Ed. 225, or communications by wire, United States v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 2 Cir., 272 F. 893, or by radio, Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 68 App.D.C. 336, 97 F.2d 641; and i......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT