United States v. Wood, 26847.

Decision Date06 August 1971
Docket NumberNo. 26847.,26847.
Citation446 F.2d 505
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michael D. WOOD, Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Gerald H. Robinson (argued), Robinson & Cornilles, Portland, Or., for appellant.

Tommy Hawk, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Sidney I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for appellee.

Before HAMLEY and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE,* District Judge.

KOELSCH, Circuit Judge.

Michael D. Wood appeals from the judgment convicting him of the crime of refusing to submit to induction into the armed forces of the United States, in compliance with the order of his Local Selective Service Board. 50 App. U.S.C. § 462(a).

The bulk of Wood's points have been foreclosed against him by the Supreme Court's recent decision in Ehlert v. United States, 402 U.S. 99, 91 S.Ct. 1319, 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (April 21, 1971). Principal among them is the contention that the "courtesy interview" extended Wood by the Board, following its order to report for induction, constituted a constructive reopening of his classification at which his claim of conscientious objection was considered and denied on the merits without affording him a hearing and ensuing appeal rights. However, since, as Ehlert makes clear, a conscientious objection which matures after the order to report is given cannot be "a circumstance over which a registrant has no control" (32 C.F.R. 1625.2), the Board could not be deemed to have reopened and precluded rights Wood might otherwise have enjoyed. United States v. Nix, 437 F.2d 746 (9th Cir. 1971).1

Nor is there merit in the remaining contention which, in substance, is that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to reopen the evidence to permit proof that Wood refused induction in reliance upon advice of counsel that the order to report was void. At best Wood's mistake was one of law; hence advice of counsel would constitute no defense, for specific intent is not an element of this crime. Williamson v. United States, 207 U.S. 425, 453, 28 S. Ct. 163, 52 L.Ed. 278 (1908).

Affirmed.

*

Honorable William M. Byrne, United States District Judge, Los Angeles, California, sitting by designation.

1 32 C.F.R. 1625.3(a), which requires a reopening for reconsideration of a registrant's classification upon "written request" of the State Director is inapplicable, even if the Director can direct a reopening in late matured conscientious objection situations. Here the latter's communications simply left to the Board the question of a reopening.

We decline to consider Wood's contention in which he attacks the constitutional validity, on Fifth Amendment due...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • United States v. Gulf Oil Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • December 29, 1975
    ...on advice of counsel and that as a matter of law such reliance negates the element of willfulness. As was stated in United States v. Wood, 446 F.2d 505 (9th Cir. 1971), the defense of advice of counsel is available when the crime charged is one requiring specific intent as an element thereo......
  • United States v. Bristol, 72-2815. Summary Calendar.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • February 1, 1973
    ...Shushan v. United States, 5 Cir. 1941, 117 F.2d 110, cert. denied, 313 U.S. 574, 61 S.Ct. 1085, 85 L.Ed. 1531. See also United States v. Wood, 9 Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 505; United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 4 Cir. 1967, 376 F.2d 675, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 850, 88 S.Ct. 38, 19 L.Ed.2......
  • U.S. v. Irwin, 76-1359
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • December 6, 1976
    ...United States v. Steiner, 469 F.2d 760 (5th Cir. 1972); United States v. Jacques, 463 F.2d 653 (1st Cir. 1972); and United States v. Wood, 446 F.2d 505 (9th Cir. 1971). IV. We find no error in the exclusion of the disputed evidence or in the court's charge on "willfulness." We have consider......
  • U.S. v. Angelini, 78-2432
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • November 9, 1979
    ...423 U.S. 853, 96 S.Ct. 99, 46 L.Ed.2d 77 (1975) (advice of counsel no defense to unlicensed dealing in firearms); United States v. Wood, 446 F.2d 505 (9th Cir. 1971) (advice of counsel no defense to violation of Selective Service Act); United States v. Locke, 409 F.Supp. 600 (D.Idaho), Aff'......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT