United States v. Woodworth, 6

Decision Date01 December 1948
Docket NumberNo. 6,Docket 20600.,6
PartiesUNITED STATES v. WOODWORTH et al.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

William H. Emerson, Corporation Counsel, Joseph B. Boyle, Charles B. Forsyth, and Henry McGonegal, all of Rochester, N. Y., for appellants.

George L. Grobe, U. S. Atty., of Buffalo, N. Y., David L. Bazelon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Roger P. Marquis, of Washington, D. C., A. Devitt Vanech, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John F. Cotter, Attorney, Department of Justice, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before SWAN, CHASE and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. The appellants contend that, as this suit was for an injunction restraining the collection of a state tax, the district court, because of the last sentence of 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(1) now § 1341, lacked jurisdiction. We cannot agree. We think Congress did not intend this statutory provision, added by amendment in 1937, to apply to the United States which was not specifically named therein. United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258, 272, 273, 67 S.Ct. 677, 91 L.Ed. 884. The Committee reports support this interpretation.1 See also City of Springfield v. United States, 1 Cir., 99 F.2d 860; United States v. Okaloosa County, D. C., 59 F. Supp. 426.

2. We reject appellants' contention that a three-judge court was necessary, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 380 now § 2281. For here the United States did not seek a temporary injunction. Ayrshire Collieries Corp. v. United States, 331 U.S. 132, 140-144, 67 S.Ct. 1168, 91 L.Ed. 1391.2

3. Land owned by the federal government is not, without its consent, manifested by a Congressional enactment, subject to state taxation, regardless of whether jurisdiction over the land has been ceded to the federal government. Van Brocklin v. State of Tennessee, 117 U.S. 151, 180, 6 S.Ct. 670, 29 L.Ed. 845. This is true even when the tax has been levied before the acquisition by the United States, if, as here, the tax had not previously become a lien. United States v. City of Buffalo, 2 Cir., 54 F.2d 471, 473.

Affirmed.

2 Judgment here was entered February 11, 1947, and notice of appeal was given March 8, 1947; accordingly, the amendments to the statute, now found in 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2281-2284, are inapplicable.

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • United States v. Sullivan
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Connecticut)
    • June 28, 1967
    ...County, 326 F.2d 929, 931 (4th Cir. 1964). The rule in this circuit has long been to the same effect. United States v. Woodworth, 170 F.2d 1019 (2d Cir. 1948) (Frank, C. J.); United States v. City of New York, 175 F.2d 75 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 885, 70 S.Ct. 189, 94 L.Ed. 543 The......
  • United States v. State Tax Commission
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • June 28, 1973
    ...1964). See also United States v. Bureau of Revenue of the State of New Mexico, 291 F.2d 677, 679 (10th Cir. 1961); United States v. Woodworth, 170 F.2d 1019 (2d Cir. 1948); City of Springfield v. United States, 99 F.2d 860, 862 (1st Cir. 1938), cert. denied 306 U.S. 650, 59 S.Ct. 592, 83 L.......
  • United States v. Livingston
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court of South Carolina
    • November 18, 1959
    ...an amendment to § 24 of the Judicial Code (former § 41 of Title 28 U.S.C.A.), what is now § 1341 of Title 28 U.S.C.A. United States v. Woodworth, 2 Cir., 170 F.2d 1019; Board of Commissioners of Pawnee County, Okl. v. United States, 10 Cir., 139 F.2d 248; City of Springfield v. United State......
  • CONFEDERATED SALISH & KOOTENAI TRIBES, MONT. v. Moe
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Montana)
    • February 4, 1975
    ....... Civ. No. 2145. . United States District Court, D. Montana, Missoula Division. . May 10, 1974. . ... of diversity jurisdiction obtain in the federal courts equitable relief 6 denied to citizens of the state." 7 United States v. Livingston, 179 ...See also, for example, United States v. Woodworth, 170 F.2d 1019, 1020 (2 Cir. 1948) ("Congress did not intend § 1341 * * * ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT