US ex rel. Lynch v. Sandahl
Decision Date | 21 July 1992 |
Docket Number | No. 91 C 06730.,91 C 06730. |
Citation | 793 F. Supp. 787 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Steven LYNCH, Petitioner, v. David SANDAHL, Warden, Shawnee Correctional Facility, Respondent. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois |
J. Mark Lukanich, Walsh, Neville, Pappas & Mahoney, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.
Marcia L. Friedl, Asst. Atty. Gen., Chicago, Ill., for respondent.
Petitioner Steven Lynch is before this court for the second time seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Presently, Lynch's sole contention is that he was denied due process of law because the instructions given to the jury at trial allowed the jury to return a verdict of murder despite findings that should have resulted in a verdict of voluntary manslaughter. Respondent David Sandahl, Warden of the Shawnee Correctional Facility, has answered the petition and now moves to dismiss for failure to exhaust available state remedies. For the reasons stated below, we deny Sandahl's motion to dismiss and grant Lynch's petition for habeas relief.
Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Lynch was convicted of the murder of Jack Herdenberg and sentenced to a term of forty years imprisonment. The following facts supporting Lynch's conviction are taken from the opinion of the appellate court on direct review, and are presumed accurate. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) (1988).
On direct appeal, Lynch, with the assistance of a public defender, argued that he was not proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and that the sentence was excessive. The appellate court affirmed. Id. at 578, 64 Ill.Dec. at 185, 439 N.E.2d at...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brown v. City of Oneonta, NY
...of the judgment. Music Research, Inc. v. Vanguard Recording Soc'y, Inc., 547 F.2d 192, 196 (2d Cir.1976); United States ex rel. Lynch v. Sandahl, 793 F.Supp. 787, 896 (N.D.Ill.1992). In this case, the court cannot see, nor has defendant Hartmark offered, an argument as to why this informati......
-
US ex rel. Emerson v. Gramley
...court will not entertain a motion for reconsideration that merely reiterates arguments previously raised." United States ex rel. Lynch v. Sandahl, 793 F.Supp. 787, 796 (N.D.Ill.1992); see also Quaker Alloy Casting Co. v. Gulfco Indus., Inc., 123 F.R.D. 282, 288 (N.D.Ill.1988) ("This Court's......
-
Bachman v. Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., 98 C 7249.
...Cir.1990), citing Above the Belt, Inc. v. Mel Bohannan Roofing, Inc., 99 F.R.D. 99, 101 (E.D.Va.1983); United States ex rel. Lynch v. Sandahl, 793 F.Supp. 787, 795-96 (N.D.Ill.1992). We do not believe that Bachman is a "misunderstood litigant" nor has he presented us with any new evidence o......
-
Harper v. Alvarez
...judgment action in which the Seventh Circuit considered the same contract at issue in the Illinois case); Lynch v. Sandahl, 793 F.Supp. 787, 795, n. 4 (N.D. Ill. 1992) ("[T]he Illinois Supreme Court has never felt compelled to accept the decisions of lower federal courts, even respecting fe......