US v. Bertoli
Decision Date | 30 March 1994 |
Docket Number | Cr. No. 89-218. |
Citation | 854 F. Supp. 975 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Richard O. BERTOLI, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
John M. Fietkiewicz, Asst. U.S. Atty., and David M. Rosenfield, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., Office of the U.S. Atty., Newark, NJ, for the U.S.
Richard Levitt, New York City, and Albert Carilli, Franklin Lakes, NJ, for defendantRichard O. Bertoli.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
U.S. v. Heater
...after the fact provision, particularly in light of 1991 modification to background commentary of section 2J1.2); United States v. Bertoli, 854 F.Supp. 975, 1145-46 (D.N.J.1994) (noting that Pierson 's refusal to apply section 2X3.1 is no longer appropriate under November 1991 Guidelines Man......
-
U.S. v. Bertoli
...began deliberations this afternoon." App. at 697. According to its March 28, 1994 Letter Opinion 3 (hereinafter "Opinion") and findings, 854 F.Supp. 975, the court based its determinations on its evaluation of "the demeanor and credibility of all four jurors upon questioning and from genera......
-
State v. Hacheney, No. 29965-8-II (WA 8/3/2005)
...535 P.2d 801 (1975). 44. State v. Rivera, 108 Wn. App. 645, 652, 32 P.3d 292 (2001), review denied, 146 Wn.2d 1006 (2002). 45. 854 F. Supp. 975, 1019 (D.N.J.), vacated in part on other grounds, 40 F.3d 1384 (3d Cir. 46. 842 F.2d 5, 8 (1st Cir. 1988). 47. Hacheney also cites Lewis v. Peyton,......
-
US v. Giampa
...v. Rocha, 916 F.2d 219, 234 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 934, 111 S.Ct. 2057, 114 L.Ed.2d 462 (1991); United States v. Bertoli, 854 F.Supp. 975, 1047 (D.N.J.1994), aff'd in part, sentencing vacated, 40 F.3d 1384 (3d Cir.1994); United States v. Crosley, 634 F.Supp. 28, 32 (E.D.Pa. ......
-
Maps, Charts, Graphs and Diagrams
...where the state asked the victim to identify body parts in the diagram by name and she identified the vaginal area. 14 U.S. v. Bertoli , 854 F. Supp. 975 (D.N.J. 1994). 15 Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Martinez , 928 S.W.2d 64 (Tex. App. 1995). 16 Ladeburg v. Ray , 508 N.W.2d 694 (Iowa 1993......
-
Maps, Charts, Graphs and Diagrams
...the time-line before she testiied or by photographing it and showing the victim photographs during her testimony. 16 U.S. v. Bertoli , 854 F. Supp. 975 (D.N.J. 1994). 17 Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Martinez , 928 S.W.2d 64 (Tex. App. 1995). 18 Ladeburg v. Ray , 508 N.W.2d 694 (Iowa 1993).......
-
Table of Cases
...1981), §5.404 U.S. v. Bentson , 220 Fed.Appx. 643 (2007), §8.400 U.S. v. Berg, 178 F.3d 976 (8th Cir. Mo. 1999), §7.300 U.S. v. Bertoli, 854 F.Supp. 975 (D.N.J. 1994), §42.300 U.S. v. Beverly , 369 F.3d 516 (6th Cir. Ohio 2004), §1.300 U.S. v. Bolden , 545 F.3d 609 (8th Cir., Mo., 2008), §4......
-
Table of Cases
...1981), §5.404 U.S. v. Bentson , 220 Fed.Appx. 643 (2007), §8.400 U.S. v. Berg, 178 F.3d 976 (8th Cir. Mo. 1999), §7.300 U.S. v. Bertoli, 854 F.Supp. 975 (D.N.J. 1994), §42.300 U.S. v. Beverly , 369 F.3d 516 (6th Cir. Ohio 2004), §1.300 U.S. v. Bolden , 545 F.3d 609 (8th Cir., Mo., 2008), §4......