US v. DAEWOO INTERN.(AMERICA) CORP.
Citation | 704 F. Supp. 1067,13 CIT 76 |
Decision Date | 12 December 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 87-03-00528.,87-03-00528. |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. DAEWOO INTERNATIONAL (AMERICA) CORPORATION and Daewoo Corporation, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. Court of International Trade |
Plaintiff has moved this Court, pursuant to Rule 59 of the Rules of this Court, for partial rehearing concerning the decision of this Court in United States v. Daewoo International (America) Corporation and Daewoo Corporation, 696 F.Supp. 1534 (Sept. 29, 1988) (hereinafter Daewoo), and vacatur of the judgment entered therein. Rehearing was granted and oral argument was had on November 17, 1988.
Daewoo, familiarity with which is presumed, sets forth the Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law including that portion of the findings and conclusions dealing with defendants' fifth affirmative defense which alleges that the Customs Service did not provide defendants with an opportunity for fair and impartial mitigation during the administrative proceedings.
In this motion plaintiff asks the Court to strike the fifth affirmative defense as inadequate as a matter of law. Plaintiff also requests the Court to vacate the judgment entered herein on two grounds: (1) the judgment holds both defendants jointly and severally liable for domestic value of the merchandise covered by the nine entries, as opposed to holding each defendant liable for the full domestic value of the merchandise; the complaint seeks the entry of judgment against each defendant and alleges that each defendant committed separate violations of 19 U.S.C. § 1592; (2) that the judgment is premature since no evidentiary support for the domestic value of the nine entries was submitted.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
US v. Jac Natori Co., Ltd., Court No. 90-08-00445.
...fraudulent intent. United States v. Daewoo Int'l (America) Corp., 12 CIT 889, 896, 696 F.Supp. 1534, 1541 (1988), modified, 13 CIT 76, 704 F.Supp. 1067 (1989). 8 19 U.S.C. § 1592(a). Earlier versions of the statute included such phrases as "with design to evade the duties", 1 Stat. 677, § 6......
-
US v. Modes, Inc.
...of law for the court. See United States v. Daewoo Int'l (America) Corp., 12 CIT 889, 895, 696 F.Supp. 1534, 1540 modified, 13 CIT 76, 704 F.Supp. 1067 (1988); United States v. Rockwell Int'l Corp., 10 CIT 38, 42, 628 F.Supp. 206, 209-210 (1986). Once again, Customs has supplied a definition......
- Mathis v. Zant, Civ. A. No. 1:87-CV-2355-MHS.
- US v. Daewoo Intern.(America) Corp., Court No. 87-03-00528.