US v. Jones

Decision Date09 April 2010
Docket NumberNo. 09-1378,09-1492.,09-1378
Citation600 F.3d 985
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James JONES, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Cornelius Raymond Johnson, Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

600 F.3d 985

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
James JONES, Appellant.

United States of America, Appellee,
v.
Cornelius Raymond Johnson, Appellant.

Nos. 09-1378, 09-1492.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: December 18, 2009.

Filed: April 9, 2010.


600 F.3d 986

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

600 F.3d 987

Robert P. Taaffe, Jr., St. Louis, MO, for Appellant, James Jones.

Brian S. Witherspoon, AFPD, St. Louis, for Appellant, Cornelius Raymond Johnson.

Thomas J. Mehan, AUSA, St. Louis, MO, for Appellee.

Before RILEY,1 Chief Judge, WOLLMAN and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

RILEY, Chief Judge.

A jury convicted James Jones (Jones) and Cornelius Raymond Johnson (Johnson) of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. Jones and Johnson appeal their convictions, claiming the government presented insufficient evidence at trial to support the jury's verdicts. Johnson also contends the district court2 erred in denying his Batson3 jury selection challenge. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

On June 12, 2008, a grand jury returned a two-count indictment against Jones and Johnson. Count I alleged Jones possessed with intent to distribute more than fifty grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Count II alleged Johnson possessed with intent to distribute more than five grams of a substance containing cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On November 12, 2008, the case proceeded to trial. The government presented testimony from six witnesses, including four police officers and a forensic chemist with the St. Louis

600 F.3d 988
Metropolitan Police Department. We summarize the relevant testimony

Officer Blake Witzman (Officer Witzman) testified that in May 2008 he was working on a Community Response Team and his duties included investigations into drug activity. On the evening of May 14, 2008, Officer Witzman received information from a source that two individuals, "James" and "Cornelius," were selling narcotics in front of the residence located at 4570 Davison in St. Louis, Missouri. The source provided Officer Witzman with a physical description of the two men and described the method the men used to conduct the drug sales. The source stated the men were standing on the porch together, and while one man would stay on the porch as a lookout, the other would conduct drug transactions with individuals who drove on the street in front of the house.

Officer Witzman notified four other officers about the information he received, and the officers decided to meet two blocks east of 4570 Davison in an effort to remain covert. The officers parked their vehicles and continued on foot until they stopped behind a fence located across the street from the residence. Officer Witzman observed several vehicles stopped in front of the residence and at least ten individuals talking to the vehicles' occupants. Officer Witzman saw two individuals standing on the front porch who matched the description the source had provided. Officer Witzman recognized Johnson, whom he had seen around the neighborhood.

After approximately five minutes, Officer Witzman observed Johnson approach the passenger side of a vehicle and have a brief conversation with the occupants. Johnson then walked to the passenger side of a second vehicle and leaned inside before returning to the porch. A short time later, Officer Witzman saw Jones approach a dark colored Impala and lean into its driver side window. Officer Witzman testified the driver extended his arm and handed Jones several plastic baggies containing large chunks. When Jones took the plastic baggies, someone in the vicinity yelled, "Police," and the individuals in front of the residence scattered. Jones took the plastic baggies, folded them inside his shirt, and ran toward the porch.

Officer Witzman testified Johnson, who was standing on the porch, ran into the 4570 Davison residence, and Jones followed Johnson inside. Officer Witzman and Officer Damon Willis (Officer Willis) pursued Johnson and Jones inside the residence. Officer Witzman followed Jones into a bathroom and observed Jones lean over a toilet, open his shirt, and discard the baggies into the toilet. Officer Witzman ordered Jones to lie down on the ground and place his hands behind his back, and Jones complied. Officer Witzman secured Jones, retrieved four baggies from the toilet, and packaged them in an evidence envelope. Officer Witzman testified the baggies contained a distribution amount of crack cocaine.

Officer Willis testified he helped Officer Witzman conduct surveillance of the Davison residence and recited testimony similar to that given by Officer Witzman. Officer Willis further testified that as Officer Witzman followed Jones into the bathroom, Officer Willis pursued Johnson, who was attempting to exit the back door of the residence. Officer Willis ordered Johnson to get down on the ground and then took Johnson into custody. Officer Willis conducted a pat down of Johnson and retrieved several clear plastic bags containing pieces of a rock-like substance, which was later determined to be crack cocaine. Officer Willis testified the amount of crack cocaine he retrieved from Johnson appeared to be a distribution amount, and the packaging of the cocaine was a common

600 F.3d 989
method of transfer from seller to buyer

Lashaun Kegler (Kegler) was a resident of 4570 Davison on May 14, 2008. Kegler testified she was inside her home when two men ran into her home, followed by the police. Kegler stated she had not invited the men into her home on that day or on any other occasion.

Margart Owens (Owens), a forensic chemist with the St. Louis Police Department Crime Laboratory, testified she analyzed the items police seized from Johnson and Jones. Owens determined the substance taken from Johnson was cocaine base with a gross weight of 6.58 grams. Owens reported the substance taken from Jones consisted of cocaine base with a gross weight of 234.98 grams.

On November 17, 2008, a jury found Jones and Johnson guilty of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base as charged in the superseding indictment. The district court sentenced Jones to 240 months imprisonment, and Johnson to 120 months imprisonment. Jones and Johnson appeal, claiming the government failed to present sufficient evidence at trial to sustain their convictions. Johnson also argues the district court erred in denying Johnson's Batson challenge.

II. DISCUSSION

A. Sufficiency of the Evidence

Jones and Johnson contend the district court should have granted their motions for judgment of acquittal because there was insufficient evidence to support the jury's verdicts. "`We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, viewing evidence in the light most favorable to the government, resolving conflicts in the government's favor, and accepting all reasonable inferences that support the verdict.'" ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Allen v. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • May 10, 2011
    ......Contrary to Allen's suggestion, the Eighth Circuit has also made clear that striking a prospective juror based on her opinion of the justice system's treatment of minorities is a permissible, race-neutral justification under Batson. See United States v. Jones, 600 F.3d 985, 991-92 (8th Cir. 2010). As with Allen's other Batson challenges, the Government's position was facially non-discriminatory and accompanied by a sufficient explanation to support a conclusion that there was no purposeful discrimination, and accordingly there is no reason to believe ......
  • United States v. Gross
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Alabama
    • November 20, 2014
    ...United States v. Mire, 725 F.3d 665, 679 (7th Cir.2013) ; United States v. Davis, 690 F.3d 127, 131 (2nd Cir.2012) ; United States v. Jones, 600 F.3d 985, 990 (8th Cir.2010) ; United States v. De La Torre, 599 F.3d 1198, 1204 (10th Cir.2010) ; United States v. Caseer, 399 F.3d 828, 842 (6th......
  • United States v. Collier
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • August 1, 2019
    ...to the contrary to be incredible, and findings as to witness credibility are virtually unassailable on appeal. United States v. Jones , 600 F.3d 985, 990 (8th Cir. 2010). Therefore, there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s conviction on Count Six.III. ConclusionFor the reasons se......
  • United States v. Lindsey
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • February 14, 2013
    ...kilograms of cocaine stored at the male victim's house. An expert testified that this was a distribution amount. Cf. United States v. Jones, 600 F.3d 985, 990 (8th Cir.2010) (possessing “234.98 grams of a substance containing cocaine base ... alone would be sufficient circumstantial evidenc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT