US v. Linson, 01-2630

Decision Date11 December 2001
Docket NumberNo. 01-2630,01-2630
Citation276 F.3d 1017
Parties(8th Cir. 2002) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. KENNETH L. LINSON, APPELLANT. Submitted:
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

Anita Lee Burns, Federal Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Heather Jo Garreston, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, MO, for appellee.

Before Loken and Bye, Circuit Judges, and Bogue, 1 District Judge.

Bogue, District Judge.

Kenneth Linson appeals his sentence after his plea of guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. At sentencing, Linson objected to a four-level enhancement of the offense level for possession of a firearm in connection with another felony, namely possession of a controlled substance.

U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) states, "if the defendant used or possessed any weapon ... in connection with another felony offense ... increase by 4 levels." At the sentencing hearing, the United States took no position on the issue of the enhancement as recommended by the United States Probation Office, however, Linson objected arguing that the shotgun is typically a sport weapon and that the room in which the gun was found contained a personal use amount of marijuana. The district court 2 expressed reservations about following the enhancement and sentenced Linson to the minimum term in the given guideline range. We, however, determine there was more than ample support for the enhancement.

The sentencing guidelines and the consistent case law interpreting the guidelines hold that possession of a firearm contemporaneous with the commission of another felony offense requires a four-level enhancement unless it is "clearly improbable" that the firearm was used "in connection with" the contemporaneous felony. U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 (n. 3); United States v. Rohwedder, 243 F.3d 423 (8 th Cir. 2001); United States v. McCain, 171 F.3d 1168 (8 th Cir.1999); United States v. Regans, 125 F.3d 685 (8 th Cir. 1997); United States v. Johnson, 60 F.3d 422 (8 th Cir. 1995).

Countless items typically involved in drug distribution were at Linson's residence and in the room with the loaded sawed-off shotgun next to the couch. Although Linson admitted to the gun possession and that there was two ounces of marijuana in the house, the search subsequent to his arrest produced countless items associated with the drug trade including; 257 grams of marijuana, a green water bong, a glass pipe with residue, a small "one-hit" pipe, rolling papers, a burnt marijuana cigarette, five sets of hemostats, electronic scales, triple beam scales, a user quantity of methamphetamine, a razor blade with white powder on it, straws, plastic baggies, a bag of white pills, flasks, rubber stoppers, test tubes, metal tongs, a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • U.S. v. Flores, CR01-3052-MWB.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • September 11, 2002
    ...has repeatedly recognized that "[f]irearms are the tools of the drug trade providing protection and intimidation." United States v. Linson, 276 F.3d 1017, 1019 (8th Cir.2002) (citing United States v. Rohwedder, 243 F.3d 423, 428 (8th 9. While the undersigned shares many of the views express......
  • U.S. v. Almeida-Perez, 07-2602.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • December 16, 2008
    ...those activities were manufacturing or simple possession or consumption, the enhancement was proper."), and United States v. Linson, 276 F.3d 1017, 1018 (8th Cir.2002) (enhancement required where gun found in proximity to personal-use amount of marijuana and paraphernalia associated with dr......
  • U.S. v. Canania
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • July 14, 2008
    ...offenses are often related and "result in reciprocal offense characteristic enhancements." Id. at 615 (quoting United States v. Linson, 276 F.3d 1017, 1019 (8th Cir. 2002)). The testimony established that the .22 caliber pistol was well within the reach of a person lying in the bed and drug......
  • U.S. v. McCarty
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • February 2, 2007
    ...1, 8 n. 3 (1st Cir.1998), and that they "hinder[ ] rather than aid[ ], the precision involved in sport shooting," United States v. Linson, 276 F.3d 1017, 1019 (8th Cir.2002). Finally, McCarty notes that § 5845(f) excludes from the definition of a destructive device a firearm "which is . . .......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT