US v. Prytz, Crim. No. 2:92-593.
Decision Date | 27 May 1993 |
Docket Number | Crim. No. 2:92-593. |
Citation | 822 F. Supp. 311 |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America v. Thomas A. PRYTZ. |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Joseph P. Griffith, Jr., Charleston, SC, for plaintiff.
Gordon H. Garrett, Charleston, SC, for defendant.
This matter is before the court upon defendant's motions to dismiss and quash the indictment, and upon defendant's motion to suppress evidence.
Defendant, Thomas A. Prytz (hereinafter "Prytz" or "defendant"), was indicted for violating 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) & (b). The indictment states:
That on or about February 27, 1992, in the District of South Carolina, the Defendant, THOMAS A. PRYTZ, knowingly received one video tape containing seven separate films which had been transported and shipped in commerce, said video tape containing visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, the production of said visual depictions having involved the use of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
Indictment, p. 1 (Count 1).
The parties have stipulated to and agreed on the basic facts leading up to defendant's indictment. Specifically, the parties have stipulated to and agreed on the factual accuracy of the government's investigative case report summary (hereinafter "government's report") prepared by United States Postal Inspector James Charlton (hereinafter "Inspector Charlton"). The defendant has submitted his own factual statement as a supplement to the government's report.1 The following factual background is excerpted from the government's report.2
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. v. Gendron
...1993); United States v. Long, 831 F.Supp. 582 (W.D.Ky.1993); United States v. Kempton, 826 F.Supp. 386 (D.Kan.1993); United States v. Prytz, 822 F.Supp. 311 (D.S.C.1993), the statute's word "knowingly" modifies not only the word "receives," but also the statute's description of the "receive......
-
U.S. v. Gifford
...view, "the language of Sec. 2252 imposes a scienter element as to the nature of the proscribed visual depictions"); United States v. Prytz, 822 F.Supp. 311, 321 (D.S.C.1993) (noting that, though the X-Citement Video court's rendition "may be correct grammatically, it is not reasonable nor c......
-
U.S. v. Brown, 93-5677
...17 F.3d at 472; Colavito, 19 F.3d at 71; Cochran, 17 F.3d at 60; Burian, 19 F.3d at 191; Long, 831 F.Supp. 582; United States v. Prytz, 822 F.Supp. 311 (D.S.C.1993); United States v. Kempton, 826 F.Supp. 386 (D.Kan.1993); United States v. Edwards, No. 92 CR 884, 1993 WL 453461, 1993 U.S. Di......
-
U.S. v. Cochran, 93-1578
...the entire paragraph" and "imposes a scienter element as to the nature of the proscribed visual depictions." United States v. Prytz, 822 F.Supp. 311, 321 (D.S.C.1993). This scheme accords with our prior constructions of Section 2252 when we did not have this precise constitutional challenge......