USA. v. Ballesteros, SIGMOND-BALLESTERO
| Decision Date | 20 April 2001 |
| Docket Number | SIGMOND-BALLESTERO,D,No. 00-50408,00-50408 |
| Citation | 247 F.3d 943 |
| Parties | (9th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. IVANefendant-Appellant |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE AMENDED OPINION OF APRIL 12, 2002.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
Klare v. State
...is required unless there is other information or surrounding circumstances of which the police are aware. United States v. Sigmond-Ballesteros, 247 F.3d 943, 949 (9th Cir.2001). The validity of a seizure is a dual inquiry: whether the officer's action was justified at its inception and whet......
-
U.S. v. Diaz-Juarez
...not have reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop. Relying primarily on this court's analyses in United States v. Sigmond-Ballesteros, 247 F.3d 943 (9th Cir.2001), superseded by 285 F.3d 1117 (9th Cir.2002), and United States v. Arvizu, 217 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir.2000), rev'd, 534 ......
-
U.S. v. Sigmond-Ballesteros
...D.C. No. CR-00-0348 NAJ. Before FERGUSON, TASHIMA, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. ORDER The opinion filed on April 20, 2001, and reported at 247 F.3d 943, is withdrawn and replaced by the amended opinion filed concurrently with this order. With amendments, the petition for panel rehearing is d......
-
Boyd v. State
...requiring reasonable suspicion unless the officer knows of other information or surrounding circumstances. United States v. Sigmond–Ballesteros, 247 F.3d 943, 949 (9th Cir.2001) ; Klare v. State, 76 S.W.3d 68, 73 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. ref'd). An officer must point to fac......
Request a trial to view additional results