USA v. Mccann
Decision Date | 28 July 2010 |
Docket Number | No. 09-30550.,09-30550. |
Citation | 613 F.3d 486 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chris Lamont McCANN, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
R. Christopher Cox, III (argued) Stephen Andrew Higginson, Asst. U.S. Attys., New Orleans, LA, for U.S.
Robin Elise Schulberg, Asst. Fed. Pub. Def. (argued), New Orleans, LA, for McCann.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Before GARWOOD, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
On March 17, 2009, a jury found defendant-appellant, Chris Lamont McCann, guilty of having been a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). He was sentenced to 100 months' imprisonment on June 17, 2009. He appeals his conviction and his sentence, arguing that the district court erred by refusing to grant a mistrial based on certain statements made by the prosecutors during closing arguments, by admitting prejudicial evidence, and by enhancing his sentence without consulting documents it was required to consult under Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13, 125 S.Ct. 1254, 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005). For the following reasons, we affirm McCann's conviction but vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing.
On the night of June 30, 2008, New Orleans Police Department (NOPD) Officers Daniel Hunter, Evan Cox, and Troy Black were patrolling a high-crime area of the city when they encountered McCann, McCoy Walker, and Stephon McGee, Jr. At trial, McCann and the Government disagreed over the details of this encounter.
The officers testified that they spotted McCann, Walker, and McGee underneath a streetlight outside Taylor Park, standing at the rear of a vehicle with an open trunk, talking. Officer Cox saw a handgun in Walker's waistband and alerted the other two officers. Officer Hunter responded by lighting up the trio with the patrol car's spotlight. Startled by the light, Walker pulled the gun out of his waistband and bolted for the park. Officer Cox jumped out of the moving patrol car and chased him. After the patrol car came to a stop, McGee removed a gun from his pocket and also ran into the park. Officer Black chased after him. Inside the park, both Walker and McGee threw their guns into a swimming pool and surrendered.
Meanwhile, Officer Hunter had been left alone with McCann. Officer Hunter testified that McCann reached behind his back. Officer Hunter drew his weapon and ordered McCann to show his hands. McCann then tossed a handgun he had drawn from the back of his waistband into the open trunk of the vehicle, closed the trunk, and put his hands up. After all three suspects had been handcuffed, the officers opened the trunk, which they testified still had the keys in its keyhole, and discovered a loaded Glock 17 pistol inside. Officer Black then jumped into the pool and recovered the other two guns.
McCann called two eye-witnesses at trial, who told a different story. One was McGee, who pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm before McCann's trial took place. The other was Mitchell Phillips, a man who lived in the neighborhood and who testified that he had been in the park on the night of the arrests watching some of the neighborhood youths play basketball. Neither McCann nor Walker testified.
McGee testified that he, Walker, and McCann had been inside the park talking to some other people when the police arrived, not outside it standing around a car, as the officers had testified. He said that when the officers walked up, several people ran away, and he and Walker immediately threw their guns into the park pool. He stated that he had not run from the police, because he was already close enough to the pool to toss his gun into it. He testified that McCann did not have a gun on him that night and that the gun McCann was charged with possessing had not appeared until the trio arrived at the police station. His testimony strongly implied that the police had framed McCann. 1
Phillips corroborated some portions of McGee's testimony. He testified that he had come to the park about two hours before the arrests to watch the neighborhood youths play basketball. He said that nobody had been outside the park when the officers arrived. According to him, the officers entered the park, and several people started running. He said that two officers chased some of the people who were running, while one officer remained behind and immediately arrested McCann, who had not been running.
It is not contested that McCann became extremely angry after he was arrested. At the police station, he kicked chairs and yelled at Officer Hunter, the only person who claimed to have seen him in possession of a firearm, that he couldn't wait for the charges against him to be dropped and that “[m]otherfucker, I hope you have a big vest under that shirt because that's your ass.” Officer Hunter interpreted this statement as meaning that McCann was threatening to shoot him.
McCann was indicted on August 7, 2008, for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) 2 and 924(a)(2). 3 He pleaded not guilty and was tried before a jury on March 16 and 17, 2009. At trial, the defense's theory of the case was that the police had framed McCann.
In his cross-examinations of the officers, McCann's counsel repeatedly and clearly implied the officers were lying. On redirect, one of the prosecutors asked Officer Cox if he and the other officers had framed McCann or given false testimony:
McCann objected to this line of questioning, but the district court overruled the objection.
During the trial, the district court allowed Officer Hunter to testify about the threat McCann had made after he was arrested. McCann had objected to this evidence in limine, but the court had decided to allow it. The district court also admitted a photograph of Phillips over McCann's objection that had identification details written under it that made it resemble a mug shot or a wanted poster.
During closing arguments, one of the prosecutors made several comments in response to the defense counsel's theory of the case that drew objections and motions for mistrial from the defense. The first comment was made after one of the prosecutors listed reasons why the jurors should not credit the testimony of the defense witnesses:
During the defense's closing arguments, McCann's counsel continued to advance the theory that he had been framed. McCann's counsel stated that the police officers
McCann's counsel also accused the prosecution of engaging in “theatrics”:
McCann's counsel continued to make similar arguments throughout his closing.
In rebuttal, one of the prosecutors responded by making the second comment to which McCann objected, moving for a mistrial:
The district court overruled McCann's objections to both of the prosecutors' comments and denied his motions for mistrial.
The jury found McCann guilty on March 17, 2009. The district court sentenced him to 100 months' imprisonment on June 17, 2009. The district court applied the highest offense level under § 2K2.1 4 of the November 2008 United States Sentencing Commission's Guidelines Manual (Sentencing Guidelines) after determining that McCann had been convicted of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Nunez v. Lumpkin
... ... (citing United States v. Lankford , 196 F.3d 563, 574 ... (5th Cir. 1999)). The Fifth Circuit applies de novo review to ... the first inquiry. United States v. Barnes , 979 F.3d ... 283, 299 (5th Cir. 2020) (citing United States v ... McCann , 613 F.3d 486, 494 (5th Cir. 2010)). “In ... contrast,” it reviews “the question of whether ... the defendant's substantial rights were ... affected” under “the abuse of discretion ... standard.” Id. (citing McCann , 613 ... F.3d at 494) ... ...
-
Nunez v. Lumpkin
... ... (citing United States v. Lankford , 196 F.3d 563, 574 ... (5th Cir. 1999)). The Fifth Circuit applies de novo review to ... the first inquiry. United States v. Barnes , 979 F.3d ... 283, 299 (5th Cir. 2020) (citing United States v ... McCann , 613 F.3d 486, 494 (5th Cir. 2010)). “In ... contrast,” it reviews “the question of whether ... the defendant's substantial rights were ... affected” under “the abuse of discretion ... standard.” Id. (citing McCann , 613 ... F.3d at 494) ... ...
-
United States v. Escalante–Reyes
...United States v. Starnes, 378 Fed.Appx. 421 (5th Cir.2010)*; United States v. Self, 596 F.3d 245 (5th Cir.2010)*; United States v. McCann, 613 F.3d 486 (5th Cir.2010)*; Richard v. Martin, 390 Fed.Appx. 323 (5th Cir.2010); United States v. Garcia–Quintanilla, 574 F.3d 295 (5th Cir.2009)*; Un......
-
State v. Anthony
...of the government's witnesses," State v. Bailey , 12-1662 (La. App. 4 Cir. 10/23/13), 126 So.3d 702, 715 (citing U.S. v. McCann, 613 F.3d 486, 495 (5th Cir. 2010) ), here, C.W. had not yet testified and Brittany Gisby never did. Basic rules of evidence also prohibit attacking a witness’ cre......