USA v. Rubashkin

Decision Date21 June 2010
Docket NumberNo. 08-CR-1324-LRR.,08-CR-1324-LRR.
Citation718 F.Supp.2d 953
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Sholom RUBASHKIN, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

Charles J. Williams, Matt M. Dummermuth, Matthew J. Cole, Peter E Deegan, Jr., US Attorney's Office, Northern District of Iowaecf, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff.

Daniel R. Fritz, Lynn, Jackson, Shultz & Lebrun, PC, Sioux Falls, SD, F. Montgomery Brown, Brown & Scott, PLC, Guy R. Cook, Grefe & Sidney, P.L.C., West Des Moines, IA, John C. Meringolo, New York, NY, Karen L. Landau, Law Office of Karen L. Landau, Oakland, CA, Alan Ellis, Law Offices of Alan Ellis, P.C., Mill Valley, CA, for Defendant.

SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

LINDA R. READE, Chief Judge.

                +-----------------+
                ¦TABLE OF CONTENTS¦
                +-----------------¦
                +-----------------+
                 
                +-----------------------------------+
                ¦I.  ¦INTRODUCTION              ¦959¦
                +----+--------------------------+---¦
                +----+--------------------------+---¦
                ¦II. ¦RELEVANT PRIOR PROCEEDINGS¦959¦
                +----+--------------------------+---¦
                +----+--------------------------+---¦
                ¦III.¦SENTENCING FRAMEWORK      ¦961¦
                +----+--------------------------+---¦
                +----+--------------------------+---¦
                ¦IV. ¦EVIDENTIARY RULES         ¦961¦
                +----+--------------------------+---¦
                +----+--------------------------+---¦
                ¦V.  ¦FACTS                     ¦962¦
                +-----------------------------------+
                 
                +-------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦¦A.¦Defendant                                      ¦962¦
                ++--+-----------------------------------------------+---¦
                ¦¦B.¦Loan Agreement                                 ¦962¦
                ++--+-----------------------------------------------+---¦
                ¦¦C.¦Sale of Portion of Interest in Credit Agreement¦963¦
                ++--+-----------------------------------------------+---¦
                ¦¦D.¦Harboring Undocumented Workers                 ¦963¦
                +-------------------------------------------------------+
                 
                +-----------------------------------------------+
                ¦¦¦1.¦Hunt Payroll scheme                   ¦963¦
                +++--+--------------------------------------+---¦
                ¦¦¦2.¦Facts leading up to enforcement action¦964¦
                +-----------------------------------------------+
                 
                +-------------------------------------------------+
                ¦¦E.¦Agriprocessors and Defendant Defraud FBBC¦964¦
                +-------------------------------------------------+
                 
                +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦¦¦1.¦Falsely represented Agriprocessors was in compliance with all laws¦964¦
                +++--+------------------------------------------------------------------+---¦
                ¦¦¦2.¦Falsified collateral certificates                                 ¦964¦
                +++--+------------------------------------------------------------------+---¦
                ¦¦¦3.¦Diversion of customer payments                                    ¦965¦
                +++--+------------------------------------------------------------------+---¦
                ¦¦¦4.¦Illegal financial transactions                                    ¦965¦
                +++--+------------------------------------------------------------------+---¦
                ¦¦¦5.¦Packers Act                                                       ¦966¦
                +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                 
                +-----------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦¦F.¦FBBC Suffers Monetary Loss Due to Defendant's Fraud¦966¦
                ++--+---------------------------------------------------+---¦
                ¦¦G.¦Mordechai Korf Offers to Purchase FBBC's Interest  ¦968¦
                +-----------------------------------------------------------+
                 
                +------------------------------------------------------+
                +----+---------------------------------------------+---¦
                ¦VI. ¦ISSUES                                       ¦968¦
                +----+---------------------------------------------+---¦
                +----+---------------------------------------------+---¦
                ¦VII.¦CHAPTER TWO: SPECIFIC OFFENSE CHARACTERISTICS¦969¦
                +------------------------------------------------------+
                 
                +-------------------+
                ¦¦A.¦Bank Fraud ¦969¦
                +-------------------+
                 
                +-----------------------------------+
                ¦¦¦1.¦Amount of Loss: § 2B1.1(b)¦970¦
                +-----------------------------------+
                 
                +--------------------------------------+
                ¦¦¦¦a.¦Amount of loss: victim banks¦971¦
                +--------------------------------------+
                 
                +------------------------------+
                ¦¦¦¦¦i. ¦Foreseeability    ¦971¦
                +++++---+------------------+---¦
                ¦¦¦¦¦ii.¦Intervening cause ¦971¦
                +------------------------------+
                 
                +---------------------------------------------------+
                ¦¦¦¦¦iii.¦Defendant's calculation of actual loss¦972¦
                +---------------------------------------------------+
                 
                +------------------------------------------------+
                ¦¦¦¦b.¦Losses suffered by livestock suppliers¦973¦
                ++++--+--------------------------------------+---¦
                ¦¦¦¦c.¦Application                           ¦973¦
                +------------------------------------------------+
                 
                +----------------------------------------------------+
                ¦¦¦2.¦Number of victims: USSG § 2B1.1(b)(1)(A)(i)¦973¦
                +++--+-------------------------------------------+---¦
                ¦¦¦3.¦Sophisticated means: USSG § 2B1.1(b)(9)(c) ¦974¦
                +----------------------------------------------------+
                 
                +----------------------+
                ¦¦¦¦a.¦Analysis    ¦975¦
                ++++--+------------+---¦
                ¦¦¦¦b.¦Application ¦975¦
                +----------------------+
                 
                +-----------------+
                ¦¦¦4.¦Summary ¦975¦
                +-----------------+
                 
                +-------------------------+
                ¦¦B.¦Money Laundering ¦975¦
                +-------------------------+
                 
                +-----------------------------------------------------+
                ¦¦¦1.¦Sophisticated laundering: USSG § 2S1.1(b)(3)¦976¦
                +-----------------------------------------------------+
                 
                +----------------------+
                ¦¦¦¦a.¦Analysis    ¦976¦
                ++++--+------------+---¦
                ¦¦¦¦b.¦Application ¦977¦
                +----------------------+
                 
                +--------------------+
                ¦¦¦2.¦Conclusion ¦977¦
                +--------------------+
                 
                +-----------------------------------+
                +-----+-------------------------+---¦
                ¦VIII.¦CHAPTER THREE ADJUSTMENTS¦977¦
                +-----------------------------------+
                 
                +--------------------------------------------+
                ¦¦A.¦Organizer or Leader: USSG § 3B1.1(a)¦977¦
                +--------------------------------------------+
                 
                +---------------------+
                ¦¦¦1.¦Analysis    ¦978¦
                +++--+------------+---¦
                ¦¦¦2.¦Application ¦979¦
                +---------------------+
                 
                +------------------------------------------------+
                ¦¦B.¦Abuse of Position of Trust: USSG § 3B1.3¦979¦
                +------------------------------------------------+
                 
                +--------------------+
                ¦¦¦1.¦Analysis   ¦979¦
                +++--+-----------+---¦
                ¦¦¦2.¦Conclusion ¦981¦
                +--------------------+
                 
                +--------------------------------------------+
                ¦¦C.¦Obstruction of Justice: USSG § 3C1.1¦981¦
                +--------------------------------------------+
                 
                +---------------------+
                ¦¦¦1.¦Analysis    ¦981¦
                +++--+------------+---¦
                ¦¦¦2.¦Application ¦982¦
                +---------------------+
                 
                +----------------------------------------------------------+
                +---+--------------------------------------------------+---¦
                ¦IX.¦PRE-DEPARTURE ADVISORY SENTENCING GUIDELINES RANGE¦982¦
                +---+--------------------------------------------------+---¦
                +---+--------------------------------------------------+---¦
                ¦X. ¦DEPARTURES                                        ¦982¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------+
                 
                +----------------------------+
                ¦¦A.¦Overview            ¦983¦
                ++--+--------------------+---¦
                ¦¦B.¦Upward Departures   ¦983¦
                ++--+--------------------+---¦
                ¦¦C.¦Downward Departures ¦984¦
                +----------------------------+
                 
                +----------------------------------------+
                ¦XI.  ¦VARIANCE                      ¦985¦
                +-----+------------------------------+---¦
                +-----+------------------------------+---¦
                ¦XII. ¦FACTORS IN 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)¦987¦
                +-----+------------------------------+---¦
                +-----+------------------------------+---¦
                ¦XIII.¦RESTITUTION                   ¦987¦
                +-----+------------------------------+---¦
                +-----+------------------------------+---¦
                ¦XIV. ¦FINE                          ¦987¦
                +-----+------------------------------+---¦
                +-----+------------------------------+---¦
                ¦XV.  ¦CONCLUSION                    ¦987¦
                +----------------------------------------+
                
I. INTRODUCTION

The matter before the court is the sentencing of Defendant Sholom Rubashkin.

II. RELEVANT PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

On July 16, 2009, a grand jury returned a 163-count Seventh Superseding Indictment (docket no. 544) against Defendant. 1 Count 1 charged Defendant with Conspiracy to Harbor Undocumented Aliens for Profit, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I) and 1324(a)(1)(B)(i). Counts 2 through 70 charged Defendant with Harboring and Aiding and Abetting the Harboring of Undocumented Aliens for Profit, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii), 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv), 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(II) and 1324(a)(1)(B)(i). Count 71 charged Defendant with Conspiracy to Commit Document Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Count 72 charged Defendant with Aiding and Abetting Document Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1546(a) and 2. Counts 73 through 86 charged Defendant with Bank Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (“Bank Fraud Counts”). Counts 87 through 110 charged Defendant with False Statements and Reports to a Bank, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 (“False Statement Counts”). Counts 111 through 124 charged Defendant with Wire Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (“Wire Fraud Counts”). Counts 125 through 133 charged Defendant with Mail Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (“Mail Fraud Counts”). Counts 134 through 143 charged Defendant with Money Laundering and Aiding and Abetting Money Laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(a)(1)(A)(i), 1956(a)(1)(B)(i) and 2 (“Money Laundering Counts”). Counts 144 through 163 charged Defendant with Willful Violation of an Order of the Secretary of Agriculture and Aiding and Abetting a Willful Violation of an Order of the Secretary of Agriculture, in violation of 7 U.S.C. § 195 and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (“Packers and Stockyards Act Counts”).

On June 25, 2009, 2009 WL 1853218, the court granted Defendant's Motion for Separate Trial (docket no....

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • United States v. Bartleson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • February 10, 2015
    ...“ ‘an arms-length commercial relationship will [...] not suffice for the enhancement to apply[.]’ ” United States v. Rubashkin, 718 F.Supp.2d 953, 980 (N.D.Iowa 2010) (quoting Waldner, 580 F.3d at 707 n. 5 ). Courts have held that “[t]he enhancement is proper in an arms-length transaction w......
  • Luana Sav. Bank v. Pro-Build Holdings, Inc.
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • December 12, 2014
    ...nearly 400 undocumented workers who were charged with a variety of immigration-related criminal offenses. United States v. Rubashkin, 718 F.Supp.2d 953, 964 (N.D.Iowa 2010). On November 4, Agriprocessors filed a bankruptcy petition, and its assets ultimately were sold. Id. at 966–67. Rubash......
  • United States v. Hernandez
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas
    • December 20, 2016
    ...the amount of loss, but whether the market factors and the resulting loss were reasonably foreseeable." " See United States v. Rubashkin , 718 F.Supp.2d 953, 972 (N.D. Iowa 2010) (quoting United States v. Parish , 565 F.3d 528, 535 (8th Cir. 2009) ) (alteration in original). Moreover, the v......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT