Ussery v. State
| Decision Date | 30 September 1929 |
| Docket Number | 28191 |
| Citation | 123 So. 854,154 Miss. 704 |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
| Parties | USSERY v. STATE |
APPEAL from circuit court of Hinds county, First district, HON. W H. POTTER, Judge.
Jeff Ussery was convicted of unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded for new trial.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.
The appellant was indicted and convicted for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors.
There was a failure in the county court, where the trial took place, to prove that the offense took place in the state of Mississippi. The venue is jurisdictional in criminal cases and may be availed of on appeal for the first time, and if the venue is not proven either by direct or circumstantial evidence to the extent required by law, the judgment will be reversed for a failure to prove venue. When circumstantial evidence is relied upon to prove venue, it must not only be consistent with the theory sought to be proven, but it must be absolutely inconsistent with any other theory. This case is controlled by Norwood v State, 129 Miss. 813, 93 So. 354; Slaton v. State, 134 Miss. 419, 98 So. 838; Sullivan v. State, 136 Miss. 773, 101 So. 683; Sandifer v. State, 136 Miss. 836, 101 So. 862; Quillen v. State, 106 Miss. 831, 64 So. 736; Cagle v. State, 106 Miss. 370, 63 So. 672; Dorsey v. State, 141 Miss. 600, 106 So. 827; Monroe v. State (Miss.), 104 So. 451; Pickle v. State, 137 Miss. 112, 102 So. 4; Carpenter v. State (Miss.), 102 So. 184.
The state contends that the conviction ought to be upheld under the case of Charlie Ben v. State (Miss.) 103 So. 818. In that case it appeared from the evidence that the offense was committed about eight miles east from where the court was then sitting, at Standing Pine in Leake county upon a government reservation, and the court said it judicially knew the boundaries of the county, and that the said place eight miles east of where the trial was being held was within the county limits and within the state of Mississippi. In the present case there was no reference in the evidence as to the distance from where the trial was being held to where the offense was committed. It is a dangerous practice to invoke the doctrine of judicial knowledge in trying criminal cases before a jury, and before judicial knowledge can be availed of as to matters of places and location of venue, it must be a matter of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Floyd v. State
...or near Flora, Madison County, Mississippi." This proof is too indefinite. Smith v. State, 27 So. 868; Ellzy v. State, 70 So. 579; Ussery v. State, 123 So. 854. A cannot take judicial knowledge that from the indefinite statement that the assault was made at or near Flora, Madison County, Mi......
-
Pruitt v. State
...Cagle v. State, 106 Miss. 831; Norwood v. State, 129 Miss. 813; Dorsey v. State, 143 Miss. 600; Norris v. State, 143 Miss. 365; Ussery v. State, 154 Miss. 704. It essential to a valid indictment that it contain a proper caption. Carpenter v. State, 4 How. 163, 24 Am. Dec. 116; Kelly v. Stat......
-
Powers v. State
......82; Davis v. State, 85 Miss. 416;. Cooper v. State, 94 Miss. 480. . . Venue. must be proven by direct evidence or circumstantial evidence,. such as is absolutely inconsistent with the theory that the. offence was committed in a county other than that charged. . . Ussery. v. State, 123 So. 854; Dorsey v. State, 141 Miss. 600. . . W. A. Shipman, Assistant Attorney-General, for the state. . . Any. witness may be examined touching his interest in the cause or. his conviction of any crime, and his answers may be. contradicted, and his ......
-
Talbert v. State
...... . . It was. a question for the jury to say whether or not malice and an. intent to kill were present at the time of the shooting. . . Venue. in a criminal case may be shown by circumstantial evidence. . . Dorsey. v. State, 141 Miss. 600, 106 So. 827; Ussery v. State, 154 Miss. 704, 123 So. 854. . . This. court has said that it will take judicial notice of the. existence and general course of railroads, as well as the. existence of municipalities in the state. . . Hill v. State, 112 Miss. 375, 73 So. 66. . . ......