Utah Implement Vehicle Co. v. Kesler
Decision Date | 29 December 1922 |
Parties | UTAH IMPLEMENT VEHICLE COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. E. J. KESLER and JOHN H. RIGGS, Respondents |
Court | Idaho Supreme Court |
CONDITIONAL SALE CONTRACT-ELECTION OF REMEDIES-ACTION-TITLE TO PROPERTY-WAIVER.
1. In case of default in payment of the purchase price of property covered by a conditional sale contract the seller may either sue for the purchase price or retake the property according to the terms of such contract.
2. Commencement of action for purchase price of property covered by a conditional sale contract vests title to such property in the purchaser and waives right of seller to retake such property.
APPEAL from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, for Bannock County. Hon. O. R. Baum, Judge.
Action to recover on two conditional sale contracts. Judgment for plaintiff. Reversed.
Judgment reversed, with costs to appellant.
Budge & Merrill, for Appellant.
"Upon default of a buyer under a conditional sale contract the seller may either elect to retake the goods and disaffirm the sale, or to affirm the sale and sue for the price, but an election of one remedy precludes him from the other." (Stewart & Holmes Drug Co. v. Reed, 74 Wash. 401 133 P. 577; Pease v. Teller, Corp., Ltd., 22 Idaho 807, 128 P. 981.)
"The seller in a conditional sale may, on default in payment waive the return of the property, treat the contract as executed on his part and recover the price." (Herring-Hall-Marvin Co. v. Smith, 43 Ore. 315, 72 P. 704; Smith v. Barber, 153 Ind. 322, 53 N.E. 1014; Taylor v. Esselstyn, 63 Misc. 633, 115 N.Y.S. 1105; D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Walther, 12 Okla. 20, 69 P. 953.)
"The commencing of an action upon a conditional sale note is an election to treat the sale as absolute and a waiver of recourse against the property." (Eilers Music House v. Douglas, 90 Wash. 683, 156 P. 937; Winton Motor Carriage Co. v. Broadway Automobile Co., 65 Wash. 650, 118 P. 817, 37 L. R. A., N. S., 71; Henry Pels & Co. v. Oltarsh Iron Works, 129 N.Y.S. 371; Mortensen Woodworking Co. v. Raabe, 117 N.Y.S. 128; Frisch v. Wells, 200 Mass. 429, 86 N.E. 775, 23 L. R. A., N. S., 144; Kirk v. Crystal, 18 A.D. 32, 103 N.Y.S. 17.)
Peterson & Coffin and Chas. H. Darling, for Respondent.
The record fails to show that title to the machinery has ever passed from the plaintiff to the defendant, and the record shows that under the conditional contract introduced in evidence, the plaintiff has no basis for an action for the purchase price of the machinery. (Harkness v. Russell, 118 U.S. 663, 30 L.Ed. 285; Atkinson v. Japink, 186 Mich. 335, 152 N.W. 1079.)
Budge, J., took no part.
This action was brought by appellant against respondents to recover on two conditional sale contracts of $ 725 each, which were described in the complaint as promissory notes. Service was not had on the defendant Riggs, and as to him the action was dismissed.
Copies of the instruments sued on were not set out in the complaint, but the original contracts were offered in evidence and are in the following form:
At the close of appellant's case the respondent moved for nonsuit as follows: "The defendant comes now and moves the court for a nonsuit and as a ground for said motion shows to the court that no evidence has been introduced showing or tending to show the value or the market value or any value of the machinery or engine described in the notes, and which forms the basis of this suit; that there has been no attempt made to realize upon the machinery in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smith v. Harrington
...a decision, contrary to the views herein expressed. It might be well to state, however, that the decisions of this court, referred to in the Kessler case, related to conditional contracts containing mere reservations of title and that none of them contained an express provision for the reco......
-
Neitzel v. Beam
... ... 658, 33 P. 759; Manti City Sav. Bank ... v. Peterson, 30 Utah 475, 116 Am. St. 862, 86 P. 414; ... Chan v. Slater, 33 Mont. 155, 82 P ... passes to the vendee and the sale is absolute. (Utah ... Implement Co. v. Kesler, 36 Idaho 476, 211 P. 1079; ... McMasters v. Torsen, 5 ... ...
-
Shipman v. Kloppenburg
...P. 402, 27 L.R.A.,N.S., 216, 134 Am.St.Rep. 270; North Robinson Dean Co. v. Strong, 25 Idaho 721, 139 P. 847; Utah Implement Vehicle Co. v. Kesler, 36 Idaho 476, 211 P. 1079; American Law Book Co. v. Later, 44 Idaho 290, 256 P. 371; Birkeland v. Clearwater Concentrating Co., 64 Idaho 122, 1......
-
Birkeland v. Clearwater Concentrating Co., Inc.
... ... Magzen Woolen Mills, 266 P. 697 ... (Wash.) , 700; Clinton v. Utah Construction Co., 40 ... Idaho 659, 682, 237 P. 427, 436.) ... Noble, 17 Idaho ... 686, 692, 107 P. 402; Utah Implement Vehicle Company v ... Kesler et al., 36 Idaho 476, 211 P. 1079.) ... ...