Utah, N. & C.R. Co. v. Utah & C. Ry. Co.

Decision Date22 July 1901
Docket Number709.
Citation110 F. 879
PartiesUTAH, N. & C.R. CO. v. UTAH & C. RY. CO. et al.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Nevada

W. R Kelly, P. L. Williams, C. S. Varian, and T. Coffin, for complainant.

T. E Gibbon, C. O. Whittemore, and M. A. Murphy, for defendants.

The subject-matter in controversy in this suit is the right of the complainant to hold and enjoy a certain right of way for a railroad through the state of Nevada. This right of way is based upon the provision of the act of congress entitled 'An act granting to railroads the right of way through the public lands of the United States,' approved March 3 1875 (18 Stat. 482). On April 19, 1901, the Utah & California Railway Company conveyed all its rights and interests in the roadbed and right of way in Lincoln county, Nev., to the San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Company. The other defendants are the agents, attorneys, and servants of the respective corporations. The conflict between the parties which resulted in the institution of the present suit was commenced by the order of the commissioner of the general land office, made January 16, 1901, directing a hearing before the local land office in Carson City, Nev., to determine the rights of the respective corporations to the rights of way herein involved. Pursuant to said order, after notice duly given, this hearing was had March 11, 1901, and upon the proofs then submitted the register and receiver found the following facts:

'(1) That during the years between August 28, 1889, to and including February, 1890, the Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Company caused to be surveyed a line of route commencing at Milford, territory of Utah, and running in a westerly direction to within about four miles from the town of Pioche, in the county of Lincoln, state of Nevada and between the same dates the said company caused to be graded a large portion of said roadbed, and constructed about 3 1/2 miles of track leading from the town of Milford in a westerly direction; that in the year 1890 all grading and construction work was abandoned, and the 3 1/2 miles of track theretofore laid was torn up and removed from said line or route, and since the year 1890 the said Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Company not having done any work or made any improvements upon its line of survey in the state of Nevada. (2) That in the year 1893 the right of way and the grading done on said line of survey within the state of Nevada was assessed by the assessor of Lincoln county, state of Nevada, for state and county taxes, to the Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Company; that when the said taxes became due the said Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Company failed and refused to pay said taxes or any part thereof, and the said property was advertised and sold by the sheriff of Lincoln county, and was bid in by the treasurer of Lincoln county for the said county, and the said property has never been redeemed from said sale by the Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Company, or by any one in its behalf, and the tax title to said property is now vested in Lincoln county, for the use and benefit of said county and the sate of Nevada. (3) That by reason of the fact that the Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Company has not complied with the provisions of section 4 of the act of congress of March 3, 1875, concerning rights of way for railroads over public land, that company has forfeited all rights, and privileges it had under its survey reverted to the government in the year 1896. (4) That in the year 1896 the Utah & California Railway Company caused to be surveyed a line of route from the boundary line between the then territory of Utah, through the county of Lincoln, in the state of Nevada, and over the line theretofore surveyed by the Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Company; that prior to the date of said survey all rights and privileges obtained by the Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Company by its survey made in the years 1889 and 1890 had been forfeited to the government of the United States by reason of the fact that the said company had failed to comply with the act of congress of March 3, 1875, and the said Utah & California Railway Company had the right to make the survey and locate its line of route over the said line theretofore surveyed and located by the said Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Company. (5) That certain maps offered in evidence by the Utah, Nevada & California Railroad Company, which had been returned by the honorable commissioner of the general land office at Washington, under date of September 16, 1899, for correction, and on the 25th day of December, 1899, forwarded by the register, by registered package, addressed to the Utah, Nevada & California Railroad Company, Salt Lake City, Utah, were not returned to the United States land office at Carson City, Nevada, or to the register or receiver thereof, until the 1st day of March, 1901, although the said registered package had been received and receipted for on the 23d day of November, 1899, by A. C. Cleveland, one of the directors of the Utah, Nevada & California Railroad Company; and, the said company not having made the corrections as called for by the honorable the commissioner's letter above referred to, for more than a year after receiving notice thereof, the said maps should not be filed. (6) That the attempted transfer of the Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Company to the Utah, Nevada & California Railroad Company is without merit, because at the date of the attempted transfer the said Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Company had no right or title to, or claim upon, the said right of way in the state of Nevada, that company having forfeited all right and claim to said right of way by failure to comply with the act of congress of March 3, 1875, as hereinbefore mentioned; and the claim that the Utah, Nevada & California Railroad Company is auxiliary to the Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Company is without merit, in so far as the said franchise is concerned. Our conclusions drawn from the foregoing facts are that the claims of the Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Company and the Utah, Nevada & California Railroad Company are without merit, the right under which they claim having been forfeited. We therefore recommend that the maps of the line of route as surveyed by them be rejected, and that the maps of the Utah & California Railway Company, filed in the United States land office at Carson City, state of Nevada, on the 27th day of February, 1897, as corrected, be approved, and that the said company be granted the right of way.'

An appeal was taken from the decision of the local land office, and on April 24, 1901, the secretary of the interior rendered the following decision:

'The Commissioner of the General Land Office-- Sir: With your office letter of the 23d instant were forwarded articles of incorporation and proofs of organization filed by the Utah & California Railway Company and the Utah, Nevada & California Railroad Company, together with maps of location filed by said companies, respectively, and in said letter it is recommended that the articles of incorporation filed by the last-mentioned company be accepted and filed, and that the map of location showing the second section of road, filed by said company, be approved under the provisions of the act of March 3, 1875 (18 Stat. 482), so far as the same crosses surveyed public land. On May 3 and June 7, 1890, this department approved four maps of location filed by the Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Company, showing its line of route as surveyed and located from the Utah-Nevada boundary line, near the seventh standard parallel, by way of Cloverdale Junction, to a point near Pioche, a distance of 70.53 miles. Said company at an expense of several thousand dollars graded nearly the entire line of its road as shown upon said maps, constructed tunnels, and did other work preliminary to the occupation and operation of a railroad upon said located line. It became financially embarrassed, and all of its property, including that above described, was purchased at foreclosure sale by the Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Utah. The work of construction along this line was discontinued in 1890 or 1891, and was not resumed until during the present month, when the Utah, Nevada & California Railroad Company entered upon the construction of the line of said road and is now actively proceeding therewith from the Utah-Nevada line towards Cloverdale Junction, Nev. The Utah, Nevada & California Railroad Company was incorporated in February, 1899, under the laws of the state of Nevada. Its articles of incorporation and proofs of organization, as submitted, have been examined by your office and found to be satisfactory, and it is shown to be entitled to acquire a right of way and to construct and operate a railroad in the state of Nevada. Its maps of location, filed as before stated, show two sections of located road, beginning at the Utah-Nevada state line, and following the old line located by the Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Company to Cloverdale Junction, which maps your office finds fully conform to the regulations governing the filing of such maps. It is proceeding with the construction of the road along said line of location, with the consent of the Oregon Short Line Railroad Company and the Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Company. Indeed, it is an auxiliary to these companies. That the rights secured by the approval of the maps of location of the Oregon Short Line & Utah Norther Railway Company, in May and June, 1890, have
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT