Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones
| Decision Date | 13 June 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 54071,No. 3,54071,3 |
| Citation | Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 236 S.E.2d 531, 142 Ga.App. 548 (Ga. App. 1977) |
| Parties | UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al. v. W. T. JONES |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Smith, Cohen, Ringel, Kohler & Martin, Robert L. Kiser, Atlanta, for appellants.
Keil & Davis, E. Wright Davis, Jr., Columbus, for appellee.
There being sufficient competent evidence in the record to support the award of the State Board of Workmen's Compensation in favor of the claimant, the judgment of the superior court affirming that award must likewise be affirmed under the "any evidence" rule.Kissel v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co., 136 Ga.App. 504, 221 S.E.2d 645(1975).
Judgment affirmed.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
Carroll v. Mission Ins. Co.
...810 (1977). The board is the factfinder, and its findings here must be affirmed under the "any evidence" rule. Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 142 Ga.App. 548, 236 S.E.2d 531 (1977). Judgment QUILLIAN, P. J., and McMURRAY, J., concur. ...
- Johnson v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
- Brown v. State