Utley v. State, 1 Div. 129
Decision Date | 09 September 1986 |
Docket Number | 1 Div. 129 |
Citation | 508 So.2d 287 |
Parties | Lawrence C. UTLEY v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
James H. Lackey, Mobile, for appellant.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and J. Elizabeth Kellum, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Lawrence C. Utley was convicted on a 12-count indictment charging sodomy and sexual abuse of several children, in violation of §§ 13A-6-63 and 13A-6-66, Code of Alabama 1975. He was also convicted on two counts of rape in violation of § 13A-6-61, Code of Alabama 1975.
Utley, who had been convicted of two prior felonies (burglaries), came to live with his uncle two months before the alleged occurence giving rise to these charges. The state's evidence tended to show that he and his uncle would pick up some children after school, bring them to the uncle's house, have them disrobe, and cause them The jury in this case had the option of finding the accused guilty of attempted rape of these two nine-year-old girls but instead found him guilty of rape. If there is any evidence of rape from which the jury might be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of his guilt, then the conviction should be affirmed. We find that the facts are insufficient to prove penetration. There is, however, ample evidence of an attempt to commit rape, a lesser included offense. Section 13A-1-9, Code of Alabama 1975.
to perform sexual acts. The lawyer for appellant Utley has filed an Anders 1 brief regarding the six counts of sodomy and six counts of sexual abuse. However, as to the conviction on the two counts of rape, he points out that there was no evidence of penetration. The only remark found in the record bearing on the element of penetration by either of the young females was that the defendant tried to achieve penetration but did not. There was no medical or other evidence offered to prove penetration. The closest testimony other than that already recited on this element of the offense is that each of the two young girls testified that the accused had "hurt them" between their legs.
This is the same situation in which we found ourselves in Pack v. State, 461 So.2d 910 (Ala.Cr.App.1984). There, the jury convicted the accused of breaking and entering a vehicle, but the facts supported only a finding of an attempt to break and enter. In that case we reversed the conviction for breaking and entering. We then directed the trial court to enter a judgment of guilty on the lesser included offense of attempted breaking and entering.
In Edwards v. State, 452 So.2d 506 (Ala.Cr.App.1983) (on rehearing), aff'd, 452 So.2d 508 (Ala.1984), this court, relying on Dickenson v. Israel, 644 F.2d 308 (7th Cir.1981), stated:
We find again "that remanding for an entry of judgment of guilty on the lesser included charge and for resentencing is the correct course to fulfill the demands of justice." Edwards, supra, at 508.
We therefore...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Buchannon v. State
...jury returned a verdict on the higher degree, it found the existence of every element of the lesser included offense." Utley v. State, 508 So.2d 287, 288 (Ala.Cr.App.1986). We find that the state's evidence in this case clearly supports a conviction of third degree We remand this cause to t......
-
Freeman v. State
...intercourse. The State presented ample circumstantial evidence of an attempt to commit rape in the first degree. See Utley v. State, 508 So.2d 287 (Ala.Cr.App.1986). Whether circumstantial evidence which tends to connect the appellant to the crime excludes to a moral certainty every other r......
-
Pardue v. State
...jury returned a verdict on the higher degree, it found the existence of every element of the lesser included offense." Utley v. State, 508 So.2d 287, 288 (Ala.Cr.App.1986). The State's evidence here supported a conviction for third degree burglary. The trial court is, therefore, directed to......
-
Burnett v. State
...sodomy, sexual abuse, and attempted rape, on charges arising out of the same incident. His case was affirmed on appeal. Utley v. State, 508 So.2d 287 (Ala.Cr.App.1986).2 The name of the older sister, S.T., was first mentioned, in the trial, during the cross-examination of appellant. Appella......