v. City of New York
| Decision Date | 20 April 1970 |
| Docket Number | No. 1478,M,1478 |
| Parties | Richard S v. CITY OF NEW YORK. isc |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Jonathan A. Weiss, for appellant.
J. Lee Rankin, Stanley Buchsbaum, and Robert T. Hartmann, for appellee.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of New York for further consideration in light of In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 90 S.Ct. 1068, 25 L.Ed.2d 368.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice STEWART dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion of The Chief Justice in In re Winship, 397 U.S., at 375, 90 S.Ct., at 1078.
Mr. Justice BLACK dissents for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in In re Winship, 397 U.S., at 377, 90 S.Ct., at 1079.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
H., In re
...to this case, since it was in the appellate process when Winship was determined by the Supreme Court (cf. Richard S. v. City of New York, 397 U.S. 597, 90 S.Ct. 1376, 25 L.Ed.2d 599 (dec. Apr. 20, 1970)). In our view the language of the Court of Appeals in Matter of D. (Daniel) 27 N.Y.2d 90......
-
S. v. City of New York
...The Court of Appeals, 27 N.Y.2d 90, 313 N.Y.S.2d 704, 261 N.E.2d 627, rendered judgment. The United States Supreme Court, 397 U.S. 597, 90 S.Ct. 1376, 25 L.Ed.2d 599, The alleged juvenile delinquent made a motion in Court of Appeals for reargument of motion for leave to appeal and made a mo......