v. Edward Fourniquet and Harriet, His Wife, and Martin Ewing and Anne, His Wife
Decision Date | 01 December 1852 |
Citation | 14 How. 313,55 U.S. 313,14 L.Ed. 435 |
Parties | John Perkins, Appellant, v. EDWARD P. FOURNIQUET AND HARRIET, HIS WIFE, AND MARTIN EWING AND ANNE, HIS WIFE |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial20 cases
-
Richmond v. Atwood, 3.
...be interlocutory whenever an inquiry as to matter of law or fact is directed, preparatory to a final decision.' So, also, in Perkins v. Fourniquet, 14 How. 313-323, court distinguishes clearly between an 'interlocutory decree,' referring the case to a master to take an account, and a 'final......
-
Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co. v. Goshen Sweeper Co.
...either upon a new appeal (if involving a sufficient amount) or by a writ of mandamus to execute the mandate of this court. Perkins v. Fourniquet, 14 How. 313, 330; In re Washington & G.R. Co., 140 U.S. 91, Sup.Ct. 673; Bank v. Hunter, 152 U.S. 512, 14 Sup.Ct. 675; In re City Nat. Bank of Ft......
-
State v. Omaha National Bank
... ... cases Perkins v. Fourniquet, 14 HOW 313, 14 L.Ed ... 435; In re Washington ... ...
-
State v. Omaha Nat. Bank
...obedience by mandamus. There is no doubt about the authority of this court to issue the writ in this class of cases. Perkins v. Fourniquet, 14 How. 313, 14 L. Ed. 435;In re Washington & G. R. Co., 140 U. S. 91, 11 Sup. Ct. 673, 35 L. Ed. 339;In re City Nat. Bank of Ft. Worth, 153 U. S. 246,......
Request a trial to view additional results