Al v. Stevens

CourtCourt of Appeal of Missouri (US)
Writing for the CourtTHOMPSON
Citation15 Mo.App. 544
Decision Date27 May 1884
PartiesC. C. RAINWATER ET. AL., Appellants, v. R. H. STEVENS, Respondent.
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Parker v. Cleaveland
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • January 28, 1896
    ...507; Hartzler v. Tootle, 85 Mo. 23; Brooks v. Nichols, 17 Mich. 38; Rosenthal v. Scott, 41 Mich. 632, 2 N.W. 909; Rainwater v. Stevens, 15 Mo.App. 544; Bradley v. Bischel, 81 Iowa, 80, 46 N.W. 755; Wait, Fraud. Conv. § 326. In the cases upon the subject there is some difference of opinion w......
  • Lazarus v. Camden National Bank
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arkansas
    • October 16, 1897
    ...for appellants. Exemptions may be selected after assignment (4 Lawson, Right & Rem., § 96; Burrill, Assignments, § 96; 59 Miss. 80; 15 Mo.App. 544; 85 Mo. 23; 100 Pa.St. 580; 36 P. 195; 12 Mich. 180; 19 So. 344; 24 S.E. 103; 64 N.W. 78), even in cases where the assignment purports to ca......
  • Frank v. Myers
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • November 22, 1892
    ...upon the question now presented; the three former sustaining the assignments, (Brooks v. Nichols, 17 Mich. 38; Rainwater v. Stevens, 15 Mo.App. 544; Richardson v. Marqueze, 59 Miss. 80,) and the last two holding that, by reason of the exception, there was no sufficient identification of the......
  • Biddle v. McDonough
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • May 27, 1884
    ...the valuation by appraisers, but he has met the plaintiff at each request by the appointment of a disinterested and competent appraiser. [15 Mo.App. 544]The only ground on which the relief is really claimed, then, is narrowed down to this: that the parties have made a contract, the performa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Parker v. Cleaveland
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • January 28, 1896
    ...507; Hartzler v. Tootle, 85 Mo. 23; Brooks v. Nichols, 17 Mich. 38; Rosenthal v. Scott, 41 Mich. 632, 2 N.W. 909; Rainwater v. Stevens, 15 Mo.App. 544; Bradley v. Bischel, 81 Iowa, 80, 46 N.W. 755; Wait, Fraud. Conv. § 326. In the cases upon the subject there is some difference of opinion w......
  • Lazarus v. Camden National Bank
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arkansas
    • October 16, 1897
    ...for appellants. Exemptions may be selected after assignment (4 Lawson, Right & Rem., § 96; Burrill, Assignments, § 96; 59 Miss. 80; 15 Mo.App. 544; 85 Mo. 23; 100 Pa.St. 580; 36 P. 195; 12 Mich. 180; 19 So. 344; 24 S.E. 103; 64 N.W. 78), even in cases where the assignment purports to ca......
  • Frank v. Myers
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • November 22, 1892
    ...upon the question now presented; the three former sustaining the assignments, (Brooks v. Nichols, 17 Mich. 38; Rainwater v. Stevens, 15 Mo.App. 544; Richardson v. Marqueze, 59 Miss. 80,) and the last two holding that, by reason of the exception, there was no sufficient identification of the......
  • Biddle v. McDonough
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • May 27, 1884
    ...the valuation by appraisers, but he has met the plaintiff at each request by the appointment of a disinterested and competent appraiser. [15 Mo.App. 544]The only ground on which the relief is really claimed, then, is narrowed down to this: that the parties have made a contract, the performa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT