v. Swint United Steelworkers of America v. Swint, PULLMAN-STANDARD

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtWHITE
Citation456 U.S. 273,102 S.Ct. 1781,72 L.Ed.2d 66
Parties, a Division of Pullman, Incorporated, Petitioner, v. Louis SWINT and Willie Johnson, etc. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA,, et al., Petitioners v. Louis SWINT and Willie James Johnson
Docket NumberPULLMAN-STANDARD,80-1193,AFL-CIO,Nos. 80-1190
Decision Date27 April 1982
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1717 practice notes
  • Aspen Skiing Co. v. Cherrett (In re Cherrett), No. 14-60079.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • October 16, 2017
    ...or to put it another way, whether the rule of law as applied to the established facts is or is not violated." Pullman-Standard v. Swint , 456 U.S. 273, 289 n.19, 102 S.Ct. 1781, 72 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982). "Mixed questions are typically reviewed de novo, but, depending on the nature of the inquir......
  • Mondaca-Vega v. Holder, No. 03–71369.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • April 25, 2013
    ...intent to be in this context—but to findings that “clearly [imply] the application of standards of law.” [Id.]Pullman–Standard v. Swint, 456 U.S. 273, 286 n. 16, 102 S.Ct. 1781, 72 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982) (emphasis added) (alteration in original). And the Supreme Court has rejected Baumgartner's ......
  • Poindexter v. F.B.I., No. 83-1151
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • June 26, 1984
    ...that the appellant's challenges fall far short of that required for reversal on this ground. See generally Pullman-Standard v. Swint, 456 U.S. 273, 287, 102 S.Ct. 1781, 1787, 72 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982). 8 Caston, 556 F.2d at 1308 (holding that a trial court's decision on appointment is immediatel......
  • Miller v. Fenton, No. 83-5530
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • September 28, 1984
    ...shown considerable concern for segregating "factual" and "legal" issues for purposes of appellate review. See Pullman-Standard v. Swint, 456 U.S. 273, 287-88, 102 S.Ct. 1781, 1789-90, 72 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982) ("ultimate" findings of fact, which are dispositive of the legal issues involved, are ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1659 cases
  • Aspen Skiing Co. v. Cherrett (In re Cherrett), No. 14-60079.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • October 16, 2017
    ...or to put it another way, whether the rule of law as applied to the established facts is or is not violated." Pullman-Standard v. Swint , 456 U.S. 273, 289 n.19, 102 S.Ct. 1781, 72 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982). "Mixed questions are typically reviewed de novo, but, depending on the nature of the inquir......
  • Mondaca-Vega v. Holder, No. 03–71369.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • April 25, 2013
    ...intent to be in this context—but to findings that “clearly [imply] the application of standards of law.” [Id.]Pullman–Standard v. Swint, 456 U.S. 273, 286 n. 16, 102 S.Ct. 1781, 72 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982) (emphasis added) (alteration in original). And the Supreme Court has rejected Baumgartner's ......
  • Miller v. Fenton, No. 83-5530
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • September 28, 1984
    ...shown considerable concern for segregating "factual" and "legal" issues for purposes of appellate review. See Pullman-Standard v. Swint, 456 U.S. 273, 287-88, 102 S.Ct. 1781, 1789-90, 72 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982) ("ultimate" findings of fact, which are dispositive of the legal issues involved, are ......
  • Coors Brewing Co. v. Mendez–torres, Civil No. 06–2150(DRD).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Puerto Rico
    • March 30, 2011
    ...judgment is to be issued “sparingly” in litigation “where motive and intent play leading roles”); see also Pullman–Standard v. Swint, 456 U.S. 273, 288, 102 S.Ct. 1781, 72 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982) (“[F]indings as to design, motive and intent with which men act [are] peculiarly factual issues for t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • CROSS-STATUTE EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS AND THE NEED FOR A 'SUPER STATUTE'.
    • United States
    • Washington University Law Review Vol. 99 Nbr. 5, June 2022
    • June 1, 2022
    ...because it cited Gross. Id. (161.) Id. (162.) Id. (163.) Id. (164.) Frappied, 966 F.3d at 1045 (citing Pullman-Standard v. Swint, 456 U.S. 273,276 (165.) Id. (citing Bostock v. Clayton County, 140 S. Ct. 1731, 1739 (2020)). (166.) Id. (167.) Id. at 1047. (168.) Id. at 1046 (citing Phillips ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT