Va. Marine Res. Comm'n v. Chincoteague Inn

Docket Number130239
Decision Date17 April 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
29 cases
  • Graves v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court
    • October 12, 2017
    ...19 of the mandatory minimum statutes needing amendment and conspicuously omitted any mention of Code § 18.2–53.1. See Virginia State Crime Comm'n, supra , at 37–38. Maybe this specific funding issue got lost in the General Assembly's decision in 2004 to build two new state prisons at a cost......
  • Va. Elec. & Power Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court
    • July 15, 2021
    ...issues of statutory interpretation and other issues of law that are subject to de novo review. See Virginia Marine Res. Comm'n v. Chincoteague Inn , 287 Va. 371, 380, 757 S.E.2d 1 (2014) ; Anthony v. Verizon Va., Inc. , 288 Va. 20, 29, 758 S.E.2d 527 (2014). On review in this Court, "the SC......
  • Hampton v. Meyer
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court
    • August 27, 2020
    ...64-65, 781 S.E.2d 191. "[A] question of law is not subject to a concession binding on this Court." Virginia Marine Res. Comm'n v. Chincoteague Inn , 287 Va. 371, 389, 757 S.E.2d 1 (2014) (internal quotation marks and omission omitted); see also Cofield v. Nuckles , 239 Va. 186, 194, 387 S.E......
  • Haba v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • June 15, 2021
    ...[they are] used." ’ " Green v. Commonwealth, 72 Va. App. 193, 203, 843 S.E.2d 389 (2020) (quoting Va. Marine Res. Comm'n v. Chincoteague Inn, 287 Va. 371, 384, 757 S.E.2d 1 (2014) (alteration in original)).This Court previously examined the meaning of the phrase "reasonable expectation of p......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • 15.4 Judicial Review
    • United States
    • The Virginia Lawyer: A Deskbook for Practitioners (Virginia CLE) Chapter 15 Administrative Law
    • Invalid date
    ...Co., LLC v. County Bd. of Arlington Cnty., 289 Va. 79, 88-89, 767 S.E.2d 1, 6-7 (2015); Virginia Marine Res. Comm'n v. Chincoteague Inn, 287 Va. 371, 380, 757 S.E.2d 1, 5 (2014) ("We have consistently held that courts do not defer to an agency's construction of a statute because the interpr......
  • 15.4 Judicial Review
    • United States
    • The Virginia Lawyer: A Deskbook for Practitioners (Virginia CLE) (2018 Ed.) Chapter 15 Administrative Law
    • Invalid date
    ...LLC v. County Bd. of Arlington Cnty., 289 Va. 79, 88-89, 767 S.E.2d 1, 6-7 (2015); Virginia Marine Resources Comm'n v. Chincoteague Inn, 287 Va. 371, 380, 757 S.E.2d 1, 5 (2014) ("We have consistently held that courts do not defer to an agency's construction of a statute because the interpr......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT