Vacancy in Judgeship No. 8 with Chambers in Linton, South Cent. Judicial Dist., and the Transfer of Judgeship No. 2 with Chambers in Hettinger, Southwest Judicial Dist., Matter of, 950024

Decision Date16 March 1995
Docket NumberNo. 950024,950024
Citation529 N.W.2d 870
PartiesIn the Matter of the VACANCY IN JUDGESHIP NO. 8 WITH CHAMBERS IN LINTON, SOUTH CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT, AND THE TRANSFER OF JUDGESHIP NO. 2 WITH CHAMBERS IN HETTINGER, SOUTHWEST JUDICIAL DISTRICT.
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
ORDER

On January 26, 1995, Governor Edward T. Schafer notified this Court of the death of Keith Wolberg, District Judge, South Central Judicial District, creating a vacancy, under Section 27-05-02.1(1), N.D.C.C., in Judgeship No. 8 with chambers in Linton, North Dakota.

Section 27-05-02.1(1), N.D.C.C., requires the Supreme Court to determine, within 90 days of receiving notice of a vacancy, whether the office is necessary for effective judicial administration. This Court may, consistent with that determination, order that the vacant office be abolished, with or without transfer of a district judgeship if necessary for effective judicial administration. See Section 27-05-02.1(1)(b) and (5), N.D.C.C.

Since 1991, the Court has had three occasions to receive and review testimony on judicial service needs, population and caseload trends, and other criteria identified in Administrative Rule 7.2, Section 4, regarding the South Central Judicial District. See In the Matter of the District Judge Vacancy in Linton, 473 N.W.2d 134 (N.D.1994); In the Matter of the District Judge Vacancy in Bismarck, 522 N.W.2d 425 (N.D.1994); and In the Matter of the District Judgeship Vacancy in Washburn, 522 N.W.2d 747 (N.D.1994). We took judicial notice of the information contained in these files and a hearing was not conducted in Linton concerning the vacancy in Judgeship No. 8. A report in accordance with Administrative Rule 7.2, Section 3(3) was, however, requested and reviewed by this Court.

We have reviewed the feasibility of transferring Judgeship No. 2 of the Southwest Judicial District, with chambers in Hettinger, North Dakota, to the South Central Judicial District if it is determined that the vacant office in Linton should be abolished in response to the reduction in the number of judgeships required by Section 27-05-01(2), N.D.C.C.

After notice, a hearing concerning the possible transfer of Judgeship No. 2 was held in Hettinger on March 2, 1995, before the Honorable Vernon R. Pederson, Surrogate Judge, acting as a Hearing Officer, and a report was been filed by Judge Pederson. Consultation with judges and attorneys of the South Central and Southwest Judicial Districts concerning the disposition of the Linton vacancy and possible transfer of the Hettinger judgeship took place in the Supreme Court courtroom on March 14, 1995.

This order is based upon a consideration of all information received and reviewed by this Court, the reduction of the number of judgeships required by statute, the need for continued effective judicial services in the South Central Judicial District, and the available, statutory alternative of transferring a judgeship if...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Hansen v. Scott
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • June 10, 2002
    ... ... Robert R. Lawrence, John Doe # 1, John Doe # 2, John Doe # 3, John Doe # 4, and John Doe # 5, ... from custody in Texas, and he began living with his sister in Mandan, where he was supervised by ... when providing transfer investigation information to North Dakota Parole ...         [¶ 8] Rule 54(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., authorizes a trial ... measured against the "interest of sound judicial administration." Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General ... No matter how those remaining contingent claims against ... ...
  • Symington v. Walle Mut. Ins. Co., 960340
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • May 13, 1997
    ... ... We affirm ...         ¶2 Symington raised feeder pigs on his farm near ... measured against the "interest of sound judicial administration." Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General ... court decided Walle Mutual's farm policy with Symington did not provide coverage for his loss ...         ¶8 We agree with the trial court that Symington's ... No matter how those remaining contingent claims against ... See Buurman v. Central Valley School Dist., 371 N.W.2d 146, 148 (N.D.1985) and Federal Land ... ...
  • Sickler v. Kirkwood, 960226
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • March 20, 1997
    ... ... 54(b) ...         ¶2 In 1982, Norbert and Loretta Sickler leased ...         ¶8 The appeal is dismissed. Costs on appeal are ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT