Vail v. Derwinski, s. 90-5559

Decision Date10 February 1992
Docket Number91-1026,Nos. 90-5559,s. 90-5559
Citation956 F.2d 812
PartiesRonnie G. VAIL, et al., Appellees, v. Edward J. DERWINSKI, or his successor, Secretary of the Dept. of Veteran's Affairs, Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota; Edward J. Devitt, Senior District Judge.

Patricia Mack Bryan, Washington, D.C., argued (Stuart M. Gerson, Jerome G. Arnold, Mark B. Stern and Ann Southworth, on the brief), for appellant.

David A. Leen, Seattle, Wash., argued (Douglas P. Radunz, Minneapolis, Minn., on the brief), for appellees.

ORDER

The petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied.Rehearing by the panel is also denied.The motion to certify the case to the Supreme Court of Minnesota is overruled.The panel opinion filed October 8, 1991, is hereby amended by adding footnote 11 to page 11, end of first full paragraph [946 F.2d 589, 594(8th Cir.1991) ], after the words "foreclosure sale" as follows:

11.After this opinion was filed, the government has called to our attention that 38 U.S.C. § 1832(a)(4)(A) was amended in 1987 imposing a duty on the agency to provide notification to the veteran upon a showing of default.See38 U.S.C.A. § 3732(a)...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Scanlon v. Northwest Mortg., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota
    • July 13, 2012
    ...considering due process challenges to non-judicial foreclosure statutes have upheld the procedure on the ground that there is no state action."Vail v. Derwinski, 946 F.2d 589, 593 (8th Cir. 1991), amended in other part by 956 F.2d 812 (8th Cir. 1992); see Apao v. Bank of N.Y., 324 F.3d 1091, 1094 (9th Cir. 2003) (collecting cases finding no state action in non-judicial foreclosure). As the Ninth Circuit noted in Apao, at least six circuits concluded in the 1970s...
  • Vail v. Brown
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • November 02, 1994
    ...home loan guaranty program. It was originally argued before our Court on June 12, 1991. This Court's opinion modifying the district court's judgment was filed October 8, 1991. See Vail v. Derwinski, 946 F.2d 589 (1991) as amended, 956 F.2d 812 (8th Cir.1992). Without discussing the constitutional arguments submitted, we held that before the VA could obtain a recovery from a veteran under its indemnity contract, the VA must make a good faith attempt to provide reasonable personal notice...
  • Vail v. Brown
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota
    • January 14, 1994
    ...District Judge. This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment, and on plaintiffs' motion for implementation of the Eighth Circuit's directives in Vail v. Derwinski, 946 F.2d 589 (8th Cir.1991), amended by, 956 F.2d 812 (8th Cir.1992).2 The Court heard oral argument on May 7, 1993. The parties have subsequently engaged in negotiations and filed additional submissions with the I. Background This class action3 was commenced on September 15, 1989, by military veterans...