Valdes v. State, No. 82-2454

CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
Citation439 So.2d 984
Docket NumberNo. 82-2454
Decision Date25 October 1983
PartiesRogelio Alejandro VALDES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Page 984

439 So.2d 984
Rogelio Alejandro VALDES, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 82-2454.
District Court of Appeal of Florida,
Third District.
Oct. 25, 1983.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Fredericka G. Smith, Judge.

Hernberg & Levin and Daniel Levin, Miami, Gargiulo & McMenimen and Brian J. McMenimen, Boston, Mass., for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Spencer v. State, 133 So.2d 729 (Fla.1961); Login v. State, 394 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Husted v. State, 370 So.2d 853 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • White v. Miami Electronics Center, Inc., No. 95-3564
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • July 31, 1996
    ...84 So.2d 910 (Fla.1956); Rosen v. Marlin, 486 So.2d 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); review denied, 494 So.2d 1151 (Fla.1986); Peacock v. Peacock, 439 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Cohen v. Roth, 417 So.2d 743 (Fla. 3d DCA Affirmed. ...
  • Forte v. Forte, No. 85-1429
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • November 12, 1985
    ...right which is for that reason not subject to modification. Farkas v. Farkas, 426 So.2d 1213 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); see Peacock v. Peacock, 439 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Accordingly, the order dismissing the husband's application for modification of the option Affirmed. ...
2 cases
  • White v. Miami Electronics Center, Inc., No. 95-3564
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • July 31, 1996
    ...84 So.2d 910 (Fla.1956); Rosen v. Marlin, 486 So.2d 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); review denied, 494 So.2d 1151 (Fla.1986); Peacock v. Peacock, 439 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Cohen v. Roth, 417 So.2d 743 (Fla. 3d DCA Affirmed. ...
  • Forte v. Forte, No. 85-1429
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • November 12, 1985
    ...right which is for that reason not subject to modification. Farkas v. Farkas, 426 So.2d 1213 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); see Peacock v. Peacock, 439 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Accordingly, the order dismissing the husband's application for modification of the option Affirmed. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT